William Eichler 03 May 2022

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote image
Image: Sangiao Photography / Shutterstock.com.

The progressive vote will be systematically ‘split’ in next week’s council elections because of the winner-takes-all electoral system, campaigners say.

The Politics for the Many campaign has warned that the First Past the Post system gives the right an advantage in local elections and forces people on the left to vote tactically.

Using data collated by Democracy Club, Politics for the Many found that in 43.8% of wards, there is one unified 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against all three of the progressive 'left' parties (Lab/Lib Dem/Green).

There are a further 35.5% of wards where there is one 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against two of the largest 'left' parties (either Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens).

In 81.7% of wards, there are more 'left' parties standing candidates than 'right' parties. There are only 15 wards in the whole of England (0.5% of wards) where there are more right parties standing than left parties.

Nancy Platts, coordinator of the Politics for the Many campaign, said: ‘We’ve seen all too many times how our voting system serves as a barrier to progressive change, amplifying the votes of some while casting others on the scrap heap. The result – a winner-takes-all system that gifts unearned majorities to the government of the day. Governments that are all too often conservative.

‘It’s a system that forces voters to vote tactically, often supporting the ‘least worst’ candidate in order to try and game the broken system. In these local elections the odds are once again stacked against progressives and the results will likely reflect that in seats up and down the country.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Employment Vetting Officer

Essex County Council
Up to £16.28 per hour
Employment Vetting OfficerTemporary, Full TimePay rate
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Employment Vetting Officer

Essex County Council
Up to £16.28 per hour
Employment Vetting OfficerTemporary, Full TimePay rate
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Director of Family Help and Safeguarding

Reading Borough Council
£105,836 - £121,235
Brighter Futures for Children is looking for a visionary leader to drive transformation and improvement in children's services at a pivotal time. Reading, Berkshire
Recuriter: Reading Borough Council

Senior Social Worker - Neighbourhood Team

Essex County Council
£46574.0000 - £56027.0000 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
This is a part time opportunity for 22.5 hours per week. These hours will cover 3 days including a Thursday and Friday, plus one other day that can England, Essex, Clacton-On-Sea
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker -Care Co-ordinator Single Homelessness Accommodation Programme

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 / £39,513- £43,693 p.a. i.e. grade 9 pre progression/grade 11 post progression
We are seeking to recruit an enthusiastic and committed professional to work as part of the Single Homelessness Accommodation Programme (SHAP). The p Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner