Stuart Crisp 09 December 2014

The spotlight off SuDS?

The government has consulted on new proposals for implementing sustainable drainage systems (SuDS). Under this initiative, the government is proposing to deliver SuDS through the planning system rather than through SuDS approval bodies (SABs).

SuDS were promoted by the Pitt review in 2007 as a means to reduce flooding. Proposals to increase its uptake were included in Schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act (FWMA) 2010. The principle behind SuDS is that a scheme is designed to mimic the natural drainage of the land by dealing with rain where it falls, as far as is practicable.

Previous SuDS proposals involved the establishment of SABs in unitary or county councils. The SAB’s would approve a scheme’s design and ensure that construction, operation and maintenance of the system is compliant with a National SuDS Standard. Under this system developments would have needed approval from both planners and SABs before a project can go ahead.

This approach, however, was not popular with developers faced with the challenge of coordinating approvals from the separate bodies. Under the latest proposal SABs will no longer be required.

The withdrawal of Schedule 3 of the FWMA and the proposed changes will mean that SuDS will no longer be a legal requirement but will be an additional planning consideration. The consultation proposes strengthening the existing planning system to incorporate an ‘expectation’ for SuDS on new developments. Drainage designs will then be approved using the tried and tested planning system.

However, since it will be down to each individual planning body to decide on their SuDS requirements, this piecemeal approach to drainage could lead to inconsistencies nationally and may result to disputes between developers and local authorities.

That said, having to deal with a single body will simplify the process for developers and may help avoid delaying a development, which is a good thing.

An effective SuDS design, however, requires a holistic rather than local focus. The absence of SABs will mean that local authorities will need a depth of drainage knowledge not generally found in town or district planning bodies - as is evidenced by the number of homes built on flood plains. A lack of knowledge of wider surface water run-off and retention issues may force councils to subcontract out this work, which will need funding - but where does the money come from?

Planning authorities can also chose not to insist on the implementation of SuDS where their costs affect the viability of a development, which could mean a SuDs solution can be ignored if a local authority is set on developing an area.

In addition, with SABs scrapped no single body will now be responsible for the adoption and maintenance of SuDS. Instead, it will be up to developers to propose a suitable mechanism for the lifetime of the scheme, the cost of which should not be passed on to the homeowner, which means that there will be less certainty in terms of responsibility and liability for maintenance.

Of some concern is that the proposal only covers developments of ten houses or more. This could see developers building large plots in phases of up to nine homes so as not to breach the SuDS threshold. And, in its current format, the proposal will not address the cumulative effect on run-off of large numbers of small developments in an area.

Nevertheless, the 10-home threshold is a good starting point, providing measures are put in place to enable resources and expertise to be scaled up over time.

It is also of concern that the consultation document refers to SuDS almost exclusively in terms of water quantity and flood mitigation. This is a far narrower definition of SuDS than that generally accepted as best practice, which, in addition to water quantity also promotes water quality, amenity and biodiversity.

Whatever the outcome of the consultation, CPSA’s members are well positioned to provide SuDS solutions. The proposed changes may result in more drainage systems connected to sewers via flow control, attenuation and storage systems, than under the original Schedule 3 proposal. In this event, CPSA members’ reputation for producing reliable products will continue to provide whole-life value.

However, should the outcome for SuDS remain more closely aligned with the original plan under Schedule 3 using SABs, new proprietary precast concrete SuDS components continue to be introduced that can effectively sit alongside vegetated SuDS and traditional gravity sewer systems.

We await the government’s decision.

Stuart Crisp is business development director at CPSA.

For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Travel Information Data Technician

Essex County Council
Up to £25581 per annum
This is an exciting opportunity to work across all aspects of the Integrated Passenger Transport Unit (IPTU). Working with a passionate and dedicated England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Planning Strategy & Implementation Manager

Essex County Council
£57621 - £61410 per annum
Planning Strategy & Implementation Manager Permanent, Full Time £57,621 to £61,410 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Accountant

Telford & Wrekin Council
£39,571 - £42,614
Are you a qualified Accountant looking to take the next step in your career? Telford, Shropshire
Recuriter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Family Assessment Worker

Telford & Wrekin Council
£25,419 to £27,514
We have a great opportunity for a full time Family Assessment Worker in the Parenting Assessment Team. Telford, Shropshire
Recuriter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Neighbourhood Enforcement Officer

Telford & Wrekin Council
£23,023 - £24,920
The post holder will tackle environmental crimes and unlawful parking. Telford, Shropshire
Recuriter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Partner Content

Circular highways is a necessity not an aspiration – and it’s within our grasp

Shell is helping power the journey towards a circular paving industry with Shell Bitumen LT R, a new product for roads that uses plastics destined for landfill as part of the additives to make the bitumen.

Support from Effective Energy Group for Local Authorities to Deliver £430m Sustainable Warmth Funded Energy Efficiency Projects

Effective Energy Group is now offering its support to the 40 Local Authorities who have received a share of the £430m to deliver their projects on the ground by surveying properties and installing measures.

Pay.UK – the next step in Bacs’ evolution

Dougie Belmore explains how one of the main interfaces between you and Bacs is about to change.