David Fagan 20 August 2014

The future of strike action

David Cameron’s government has responded to recent public sectors strikes by promising to toughen up current strikes law in their 2015 election manifesto.

Trade unions, however, have argued that such an approach is discriminatory and unnecessary.

Under current regulations, for a strike to be authorised, unions must achieve a majority support of voters in a properly organised ballot while adhering to an extensive list of procedural requirements. Without this, an employer will have grounds to seek damages or an injunction to prevent strike action going ahead.

The conservative plans include a requirement that at least half of eligible union members must vote to secure a strike mandate and a 3 month time limit after the ballot for the strike action to take place, curtailing so called ‘rolling mandates’, which has seen walk-outs occur several months after the vote.

What does this mean for local government?

With the effect of austerity likely to be felt on local government finances well into the next Parliament the scope for further industrial action in the future seems high.

Many unions argue that legislation is restrictive enough already, and that new rules would make legitimate strikes ‘close to impossible’. A 50% threshold is likely to be out of reach in most cases and this could lead to challenge in the European Court of Human Rights.

If the proposals become law then the prospect of fewer days lost to industrial action will be welcome news to local government employers. However, if a successful strike ballot becomes more difficult to achieve there will be more emphasis on existing consultative and dispute resolution procedures. Local authorities and councils may look forward to spending even more time negotiating in future.

It is possible that acknowledging that a successful strike mandate will be unlikely might encourage more creative and engaged collaboration, but there must also be a risk that if negotiations break down and staff do not have the option of a strike employers might have to deal with an increasingly resentful and un-cooperative workforce.

At worst, tougher laws may result in an increased occurrence of unlawful strikes and the pay, disciplinary and other HR issues which inevitably accompany them.

Of course these measures will only be enacted if the Conservative Party succeeds at the next election. Even then many manifesto pledges fail to make it to the statute book. We will therefore have to wait to see whether these proposals are ever carried through.

David Fagan is employment partner at Weightmans LLP

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

PRINCIPAL TRANSPORT PLANNING OFFICER

Hull City Council
£43693 - £46731
We have an exciting opportunity for an experienced professional to join our team in Hull as a Principal Transport Planning Officer. Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire
Recuriter: Hull City Council

HIGHWAYS AND TRAFFIC ENGINEER - 4 POSTS

Hull City Council
£43693 - £46731
We have several exciting opportunities for suitably qualified Highways Civil Engineers and Traffic Engineers Wilson Centre, 1st floor, Hull HU1 2AG
Recuriter: Hull City Council

Strategic Director, Finance and Resources (S.151 Officer)

Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
£110,799 - £120,706
Blackburn with Darwen is a distinctive, welcoming and vibrant borough with a strong identity and a genuine buzz about the place. Blackburn, Lancashire
Recuriter: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Residential Worker, Edge of Care Service

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £29,093 - £32,654 PAY AWARD PENDING
Join a Groundbreaking Team Supporting Families in Seaham Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Bikeability Cycling Instructor

Durham County Council
Grade 4 £24,790 to £25,992 pro rata (Pay Award Pending)
The Road Safety Team are keen to recruit additional Casual Bikability Instructors to join our team of instructors delivering Bikeability cycle trainin Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner