Ann McGauran 20 April 2021

Shielding scheme took too long to identify up to 800,000, says PAC

Shielding scheme took too long to identify up to 800,000, says PAC image

MPs have hit out at the Government’s ‘quickly drawn up’ COVID-19 shielding programme for taking too long to identify up to 800,000 people who may have missed out on help.

Selective application of ‘at risk’ criteria led to some elderly and vision-impaired people struggling to access food at the start of the pandemic, according to a report from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) published today.

Almost half of the 800,000 were unreachable because of missing or incorrect telephone numbers in NHS records and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) still does not know whether councils have been able to reach them.

The report said that a newly expanded approach to vulnerability, which includes key characteristics such as ethnicity, postcode and body mass index resulted in an additional 1.7m people being classified as clinically extremely vulnerable in February.

Chair of the PAC Meg Hillier said: ‘The shielding response in the COVID pandemic has particularly exposed the high human cost of the lack of planning for shielding in pandemic planning scenarios.

'It also highlights the perennial issue of poor data and joined up policy systems.

‘There are questions still to be answered about the balance between central decision-making and local knowledge – the increase in numbers of those advised to shield demonstrates the challenges of trying to deliver this programme centrally, as well as with the data held by the NHS.'

‘Plans were, eventually, sensibly devolved to local authorities.' 

MHCLG has been approached for comment.

Devolutions clean air dividend image

Devolution's clean air dividend

Jane Burston of Clean Air Fund argues that tackling air pollution is one of the clearest ways for local leaders to prove devolution can transform lives.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Internal Auditor

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Negotiable
Dig into the detail. Shape smarter services. Help us build a better borough.Behind every great Council is a team that makes sure things are working as England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Technical Officer - Asbestos

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£45,091- £47,181
As the Asbestos Technical Officer, you will play a pivotal role in ensuring statutory, regulatory and best practice requirements Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Principal Lawyer - Planning and Highways

LocalGovJobs Legal
£51,356 to £56,494
Do you want to make a difference to local people? Huddersfield, West Yorkshire / surrounding area
Recuriter: LocalGovJobs Legal

Senior Lawyer - Safeguarding Children or Adults

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£41,771 to £50,269
Candidates may specify whether they are seeking an adult service role or children’s focus role Huddersfield, West Yorkshire / hybrid
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Principal Lawyer Litigation and Housing

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£51,356 to £56,494
We are looking for an enthusiastic, hardworking Lawyer to take on a leadership role within our Litigation and Housing Team. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Linkedin Banner