Nick Appleyard 15 July 2011

Opponents blast plans for high-speed rail

Local transport schemes offer better value for scarce public money than plans for the High Speed Rail (HS2) line from London to Birmingham, a select committee inquiry was told this week.

Opponents to the Government’s £32bn fl agship transport scheme told the Commons transport committee there were better ways to invest in infrastructure. However, those giving evidence could not agree on a preferred alternative. John Tomaney, professor of regional development at Newcastle University, suggested the money would be better spent on local schemes in cities.

He said: ‘The evidence is much stronger that investments at the metropolitan levels is [better]. Rail can be part of that, but so could buses and the ability to move pedestrians around the city.’

Lord Wolfson told MPs he opposed the scheme on the grounds it did not represent good value for money. ‘The key for good infrastructure in this country is investing sensibly,’ he said. ‘I would like to see more investment in infrastructure. But the level of return on this investment [does not compare favourably] with what you could get elsewhere.

When asked by Tory MP, Kwasi Kwarteng, why every country in the developed world was investing in extending high-speed rail, Lord Wolfson said: ‘The question is, “is it the top priority for UK investment?” And the answer has to be “no”.’ Lord Wolfson said the Eddington report showed the average return of investment for road schemes was 3.7:1 compared to HS2’s, which stood at 2.6:1.

‘There are many projects which should be taking priority over HS2. For example, widening of motorways and elimination of pinch points on our road network.

‘Given the limited amount of money available, it’s not in the national interest to take a huge chunk of it and invest it in HS2. It doesn’t make sense to prioritise rail over road.’ But Prof Tomaney said: ‘I would not support that. There is no evidence of that.’

However, he agreed HS2 was not a sensible option, and said the UK needed ‘regional planning policy before it started to think about high-speed rail’.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior/Principal Regeneration Officer

Fareham Borough Council
£45,465 - £55,379
Our town centre regeneration is moving from planning to delivery, and we're looking for someone who wants to help make regeneration happen. Fareham, Hampshire
Recuriter: Fareham Borough Council

Social Worker

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£40,260 - £54,507
Social Worker£... London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

S106 and Monitoring Officer

Essex County Council
£49435.1400 - £54930.6000 per annum
Maldon District Council is working in partnership with Essex Shared Services to support the recruitment of the role of a S106 and Monitoring Officer, England, Essex, Maldon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officer (Part Time)

Isle of Wight Council
Career Grade 3-6, £26,017 to £29,071 per annum pro-rata (actual salary £17,227.47 to £19,249.72)
The Benefits team is currently seeking a part-time Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officers Ryde, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council

Legal Officer

Isle of Wight Council
Grade 9, £35,572 to £38,726 per annum
Ideally you will be a qualified paralegal or will offer an equivalent qualification or experience. Newport, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council
Linkedin Banner