William Eichler 22 September 2017

Ofsted inspection reforms could create ‘uncertainty’, head teachers warn

A teachers union has lashed out at Ofsted’s proposals to change the short inspection process, saying it will create a ‘cloud of uncertainty’ in schools.

The schools inspection service yesterday launched a consultation on proposals to change the way short inspections convert a school’s rating.

Under the new proposals, if inspectors are not confident a school is still ‘Good’ but the standard of education remains acceptable and there are no safeguarding issues, they will not convert.

Instead, Ofsted will publish a letter setting out the school’s strengths and areas for improvement and a section 5 inspection will take place one to two years later.

This will provide schools with a window of opportunity to address weaknesses and it will give Ofsted Inspectors (OIs), who are usually busy school leaders, more certainty as to their timetables.

The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) has, however, criticised the proposals.

Nick Brook, deputy general secretary of NAHT, which represents leaders in the majority of schools in England, said the proposed arrangements would create ‘uncertainty’ for parents, staff and governors.

‘For the most part, parents, staff and governors understand the current four ratings (Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement and Inadequate),’ he said.

‘If, after a one day visit, inspectors are not able to determine that a school is still ‘Good’, they will now mark it out for re-inspection. This could be up to three years later - an unacceptably long delay.

‘A cloud of uncertainty will linger over the school until Ofsted can arrange a return.

‘Until the inspectors return all the school community will be left with is a letter which outlines the misgivings of inspectors but only gives a vague “not sure” or “good-ish” verdict.

‘Parents may well wonder what is the point of inspection if it doesn't tell them how effective their child's school is and leaves behind more questions than answers.’

‘The uncertainty about the quality of education provided could become the single biggest barrier to improvement that the school in question will face,’ he added.

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Digital Support Analyst

Essex County Council
£30685.00 - £36099.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Digital Support AnalystPermanent, Full Time£30,685 to £36,099 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Commissioning Officer - Children's Service and Education Contracts

The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead
£39,526 - £43,613
We have an exciting opportunity available for a Commissioning Officer Maidenhead, Berkshire
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead

Part Time Vocational Trainer - Health and Social Care

Essex County Council
£38466.00 - £45254.00 per annum + Pro Rata
Part Time Vocational Trainer - Health and Social Care - South EssexPermanent, Part Time£29,468 to £34,668 Per Annum (full time equivalent) Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Permits Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£30,225 - £42,888 per annum
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Assistant Director of Housing

City of York Council
£86,537 – £95,898
The city is entering an exciting period of transformation. York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council
Linkedin Banner