William Eichler 09 October 2017

Number of green belt sites pegged for development ‘doubled’, campaigners say

The number of sites facing development on London’s green belt has more than doubled since last year, campaigners warn.

New research from the London Green Belt Council (LGBC) has revealed between July 2016 and July 2017 the number of sites earmarked for development on the capital’s green belt increased from 203 to 443.

The total number of houses proposed to be built on these sites went from 123,528 to 163,474.

The report, entitled The accelerating loss of London’s Green Belt - who is to blame?, found the councils with the greatest number of houses proposed to be built on green belt land are Central Bedfordshire (17,100), East Hertfordshire (16, 950) and Basildon (13,035).

The counties with the greatest number of ‘threats’ - as LGBC characterises them - are Hertfordshire (44,974 houses), Surrey (41,760) and Essex (35,674).

The council is a grouping of about 100 organisations which campaign locally against development on green belt land. They collectively represent over 50,000 people.

‘Councils are being pushed by Government to set targets which are much higher than will ever be built,’ said LGBC chair Richard Knox-Johnston.

‘They must release land even though it won’t be needed. None of this will have any impact on the overall supply of housing because land supply was never the problem.

‘But it will mean that Green Belt will be built on before brownfield land. So this is fundamentally undermining the purpose of the green belt – to promote much needed regeneration in run down areas and contain urban sprawl.’

Mr Knox-Johnston said action was ‘urgently’ needed to avoid ‘irreparable’ damage to the capital’s green belt.

‘Instead of proposing ill-thought out methods for calculating targets which conflate housing need with market demand, the Government should be reducing the pressure on councils to build on Green Belt land by focusing on genuine housing need and restricting the ability of councils to de- designate Green Belt land,’ he added.

For more on the green belt and the housing crisis read our feature, ‘Do we REALLY need the green belt?’

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner