William Eichler 09 October 2017

Number of green belt sites pegged for development ‘doubled’, campaigners say

The number of sites facing development on London’s green belt has more than doubled since last year, campaigners warn.

New research from the London Green Belt Council (LGBC) has revealed between July 2016 and July 2017 the number of sites earmarked for development on the capital’s green belt increased from 203 to 443.

The total number of houses proposed to be built on these sites went from 123,528 to 163,474.

The report, entitled The accelerating loss of London’s Green Belt - who is to blame?, found the councils with the greatest number of houses proposed to be built on green belt land are Central Bedfordshire (17,100), East Hertfordshire (16, 950) and Basildon (13,035).

The counties with the greatest number of ‘threats’ - as LGBC characterises them - are Hertfordshire (44,974 houses), Surrey (41,760) and Essex (35,674).

The council is a grouping of about 100 organisations which campaign locally against development on green belt land. They collectively represent over 50,000 people.

‘Councils are being pushed by Government to set targets which are much higher than will ever be built,’ said LGBC chair Richard Knox-Johnston.

‘They must release land even though it won’t be needed. None of this will have any impact on the overall supply of housing because land supply was never the problem.

‘But it will mean that Green Belt will be built on before brownfield land. So this is fundamentally undermining the purpose of the green belt – to promote much needed regeneration in run down areas and contain urban sprawl.’

Mr Knox-Johnston said action was ‘urgently’ needed to avoid ‘irreparable’ damage to the capital’s green belt.

‘Instead of proposing ill-thought out methods for calculating targets which conflate housing need with market demand, the Government should be reducing the pressure on councils to build on Green Belt land by focusing on genuine housing need and restricting the ability of councils to de- designate Green Belt land,’ he added.

For more on the green belt and the housing crisis read our feature, ‘Do we REALLY need the green belt?’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Erase Assistant Team Manager

Durham County Council
Grade 10 £38,220 - £41,771
Are you passionate about improving outcomes for teenagers at risk of exploitation, missing episodes and harm outside the home?   Durham Children's Ser Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant – SEN

Durham County Council
£28,142 to £31,022 (Pro rata)
Permanent Contract- Full Time 37 hours per week- Monday 8.10am to 4pm Tuesday 8.10am to 4pm Wednesday 8.10am to 4.40pm Thursday 8.10am to 4pm Friday 8 Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisor

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro Rata)
7.5 hours per week (11
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Temporary Contract until 12th February 2027. Part Time – 7hrs 30mins a week (11.45am to 1.15pm Mon-Fri)   We are looking for a Lunchtime Supervisor to Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Head of Finance - Children & Young People’s Service

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£75,585 - £80,726 (pay award pending)
This is a great place to work for people who want to make a real difference. Riverside House, Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Linkedin Banner