Heather Jameson 15 June 2020

IFS exposes impact of COVID-19 on different areas

The balance of protecting public health and returning to economic activity varies from one area to the next, research by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found.

In a report that could have wider implications for a localised response to the virus, the IFS found the cost of lockdown could even vary in neighbouring local authories.

Torbay and the Isle of Wight are the areas likely to be hardest hit by the COVID-19 crisis, the IFS said, but there is no north-south or urban-rural divide.

Instead there is a ‘patchwork’ of problems which all impact on how susceptible local authority will be to the virus. These include places with an elderly population, a heavy reliance on tourism and high levels of social deprivation.

One of the report authors, Imran Rasul, said: ‘There is no single measure that captures all the different types of vulnerability during this crisis. The risks to public health, local economies and vulnerable families are spread across England in a patchwork.

‘The crisis will require policymakers at different levels to coordinate their response, since the geography of vulnerabilities has shifted away from the traditional North–South or urban–rural divides.’
Mark Franks, director of Welfare at the Nuffield Foundation which supported the research, said: ‘This report illustrates how different areas of England will be affected by the virus in a unique way, which means the impact on health, jobs and families will evolve differently within each area as we progress through the stages of this crisis.

‘The government needs to understand these localised differences in timescales and impacts in order to work effectively with local authorities to target the right support in the right areas at the right time.’
The report found:

  • Neighbouring authorities have a different experience of the crisis
  • Coastal areas are vulnerable to both health and economic impacts of the crisis
  • The northern spine of England – including South Yorkshire, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire – are more vulnerable than average
  • More affluent areas will take a bigger hit on the economy
  • London has seen high rates of COVID-19, but its younger population is less exposed to serious risk from the virus
  • Designing policy to reflect local need will require a highly co-ordinated response
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Worker - Adoption Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£36124.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker - Adoption Mid EssexPermanent, Full Time - 37 hours per week£36,124 to £51,834 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Social Worker - Learning Disability & Autism

Essex County Council
£48205.0000 - £57988.0000 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
Senior Social Worker - Learning Disability & AutismPermanent, Full Time£48,205 to £57,988 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Finance Officer - Income Collection

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £28621.0000 per annum
Finance Officer - Income CollectionFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 to £28,621 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Democratic Services Officer

Essex County Council
£30295.0000 - £35641.0000 per annum
Democratic Services OfficerSecondment, Full Time£30,295 to £35,641 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Democratic Services Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£47,730 - £57,837
Democratic Services Officer
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner