Heather Jameson 15 June 2020

IFS exposes impact of COVID-19 on different areas

The balance of protecting public health and returning to economic activity varies from one area to the next, research by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found.

In a report that could have wider implications for a localised response to the virus, the IFS found the cost of lockdown could even vary in neighbouring local authories.

Torbay and the Isle of Wight are the areas likely to be hardest hit by the COVID-19 crisis, the IFS said, but there is no north-south or urban-rural divide.

Instead there is a ‘patchwork’ of problems which all impact on how susceptible local authority will be to the virus. These include places with an elderly population, a heavy reliance on tourism and high levels of social deprivation.

One of the report authors, Imran Rasul, said: ‘There is no single measure that captures all the different types of vulnerability during this crisis. The risks to public health, local economies and vulnerable families are spread across England in a patchwork.

‘The crisis will require policymakers at different levels to coordinate their response, since the geography of vulnerabilities has shifted away from the traditional North–South or urban–rural divides.’
Mark Franks, director of Welfare at the Nuffield Foundation which supported the research, said: ‘This report illustrates how different areas of England will be affected by the virus in a unique way, which means the impact on health, jobs and families will evolve differently within each area as we progress through the stages of this crisis.

‘The government needs to understand these localised differences in timescales and impacts in order to work effectively with local authorities to target the right support in the right areas at the right time.’
The report found:

  • Neighbouring authorities have a different experience of the crisis
  • Coastal areas are vulnerable to both health and economic impacts of the crisis
  • The northern spine of England – including South Yorkshire, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire – are more vulnerable than average
  • More affluent areas will take a bigger hit on the economy
  • London has seen high rates of COVID-19, but its younger population is less exposed to serious risk from the virus
  • Designing policy to reflect local need will require a highly co-ordinated response
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Education Navigator - Integrated Front Door

Cheshire East Council
£43,149 - £49,658 per annum
Are you passionate about making a positive difference to the lives of children, young people and families? Macclesfield, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

Executive Director of Finance and Assets (Section 151 Officer)

West Surrey Council
£161,239–£177,363
You will also lead a more strategic approach to West Surrey’s assets, income and commercial activity. West Surrey
Recuriter: West Surrey Council

Technical & Validation Officer

Ashfield District Council
£29,542 - £32,046 per annum
We have an opportunity available for a Technical & Validation Officer Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottingham
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environmental Services Operative (Driver)

Ashfield District Council
£27,274 - £29,071 per annum
Where applicable the skills, qualifications and memberships required for this job have also been included. Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environment Area Supervisor

Ashfield District Council
£33,119 - £35,570 per annum
We are seeking an experienced, forward-thinking and highly motivated operational team leader Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council
Linkedin Banner