William Eichler 27 January 2017

Hampshire CC opposition makes Solent combined authority deal ‘unlikely’

Opposition from Hampshire County Council has made it ‘highly unlikely’ the Solent combined authority deal will proceed, council leader claims.

The proposed deal, including Portsmouth, Southampton, Isle of Wight, Fareham, Gosport, Havant Eastleigh and East Hampshire, would have brought £1bn of Government investment to the Solent.

However, Hampshire CC has in the past resisted plans to create a Solent combined authority arguing independent research showed a new unitary authority would be a better way of saving money and protecting public services.

Leader of Portsmouth City Council Donna Jones yesterday accused Hampshire of blocking the deal and costing the area £1bn.

‘Hampshire County Council was the only remaining partner in the Solent that refused to support the Solent Deal,’ she said.

‘Because of this, and following yesterday's meeting with the Hampshire MPs, it now looks highly unlikely that the current deal will go ahead.’

‘If it fails this will mean the £1bn investment to the Solent area has been lost,’ Cllr Jones continued.

‘The additional pressure this places on our roads and rail is huge - this area has been under-invested for decades and we are losing out to the north of England.’

Hampshire leader Cllr Roy Perry responded to Portsmouth’s accusations saying the deal made ‘no economic sense’.

‘I have written to the Solent leaders explaining why the technical analysis they had commissioned doesn’t work and doesn’t support their case,’ he said.

‘We have gone through it carefully and know that to be so.

‘The Solent bid would not help the local economy, it would do it harm by isolating the area from the economic resources of the wider county as well as forcing the dismantling of vital county services – now and in the future.’

In the event the Solent deal is not realised, Cllr Jones said, some of Hampshire’s 14 councils should consider merging ‘to end up with fewer larger all-purpose councils’.

She said these unitary councils could save the taxpayer an estimated £100m a year.

However, Cllr Perry also disagreed with this proposal and said it made ‘no sense financially or for services’. Instead, he insisted a county-wide unitary authority would be the best approach.

‘There is actually an overwhelming financial and service case for creating a county- wide unitary, as is being planned in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire,’ he said.

‘All local and national evidence shows that this would do more than any other model to save money, protect vital services and cut council tax.’

‘I am calling on my fellow leaders to call a halt, knowing that nothing will now be forthcoming from central Government for the time being at least, and let us get back around the table in the interests of all of our communities,’ he added.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Assistant Service Manager

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£48,873 - £59,220
Assistant Service Manager<... Wandsworth, London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Educational Psychologist - Main Grade

Essex County Council
£43483.0000 - £63394.0000 per annum
Essex County Council is seeking passionate and dedicated Main Grade Educational Psychologists to join our quadrant-led teams. England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Product Support Analyst

Essex County Council
£33512.0000 - £39425.0000 per annum
Senior Product Support AnalystPermanent, Full Time£33,512 to £39,425 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Cycle Fleet Operator

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.00 per annum
Cycle Fleet OperatorFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Cycle Fleet Operator

Essex County Council
Up to £25081.00 per annum
Cycle Fleet OperatorFixed Term, Full Time£25,081 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner