Nicki Mableson Matthew Spry 29 July 2020

Following Orders: five actions necessary for DCOs

Following Orders: five actions necessary for DCOs image

Among the planning reform ideas floated in recent months has been to use the Development Consent Order (DCO) process for large-scale housing developments.

The Social Market Foundation even went so far as to suggest it should be the default consenting route for all schemes over 1,000 dwellings in order to address a ‘convoluted, expensive and uncertain planning system’.

Lichfields has examined the detail behind the suggestion, based on practical experience delivering large-scale housing projects, and in progressing DCOs for infrastructure and commercial projects.

The current barriers for major housing projects include local plan delays and convincing inspectors that delivery and viability hurdles can be overcome.

Any DCO reform has to overcome these problems, whilst avoiding over-burdening schemes which already require significant investment in planning and technical resources to progress.

The DCO system has been a proven success for infrastructure schemes: once submitted, the majority are determined and approved within set timescales, providing ‘one-stop-shop’ consents, including CPO.

But one should guard against a simplistic assumption that the benefits automatically transfer to housing.

A tailored solution is needed for this reform to fly:

1. Establishing the principle of need and location

The time spent progressing large-scale housing schemes is often in resolving contested questions of need for the development. Removing this debate on most DCOs via National Policy Statements (NPS) was a central tenet of the NSIP regime, and something similar is needed for housing. Most developers will want the principle of the project to have been established before embarking on a costly DCO process.

This could be - as now - via the development plan, but for the largest schemes of 5,000+ dwellings, other options are available: beefing up para 72 of the NPPF; a new NPS for new settlements; a long term Spatial Framework (such as that it proposes for the OxCam Arc); mirroring the method used for establishing locally-led Development Corporations; or augmenting how it select schemes for the Garden Communities programme.

2. Clearer guidance on flexibility

The use of a parameters-based approach for housing applications is well established and familiar to developers. However, the extent of flexibility typically sought would likely conflict with the typical approach for DCO schemes. Guidance could cover matters such as setting the appropriate level of detail and a greater use of design codes.

3. The detailed approval process

A DCO is often quite rigid, whereas large-scale housing often requires amendments to reflect changing circumstances over decades of build out. It may be necessary to enshrine greater involvement of the LPA in dealing with detailed submissions and amendments.

4. Resourcing at PINs and LPAs

PINs will need sufficient resources whilst ensuring there is no lessening of service to traditional NSIPs. Similarly, LPAs will need greater investment in training, knowledge, guidance and manpower to ensure that they can fully engage.

5. Guidance on meaningful consultation

PINs should extend its guidance to reflect the different – often political - context for consultation on housing schemes, including how to resolve matters prior to examination, which is a key benefit of the DCO process.

Matthew Spry is senior director and Nicki Mableson is planning and EIA director at Lichfields

Has Grenfell ground to a halt? image

Has Grenfell ground to a halt?

Adam Jurka looks at why buildings with dangerous cladding should follow NFCC guidance and move over to safer and more permanent interim measures to protect residents from fire.
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Social Worker - LD & Autism

Essex County Council
£30906 - £42254 per annum
Senior Social Worker / Senior Occupational Therapist/ Senior Practitioner With us, you can achieve more - for yourself as well as those you work to s England, Essex, Harlow
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker - Assessment and Intervention

Essex County Council
£30906 - £42254 per annum + + Free On-Site Parking & Benefits Package
Social Worker - Assessment and InterventionPermanentFull Time£30,906 to £42,254 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker - Children with Disabilities

Essex County Council
Social Worker - Children with DisabilitiesPermanent, Full Time£30,906 to £42,254 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Duty Manager (South Woodham Ferrers Leisure Centre)

Chelmsford City Council
Grade 5 - Starting at £22,944 per annum, rising to £25,284
South Woodham Ferrers Leisure Centre is one of Chelmsford City Council's excellent leisure facilities which offers a variety of sporting activities... Chelmsford, Essex
Recuriter: Chelmsford City Council

Assistant Director - Inclusion

Suffolk County Council
£75,745 - £93,245 pa
We are seeking a highly skilled Assistant Director Ipswich, Suffolk
Recuriter: Suffolk County Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue