William Eichler 28 September 2017

Developers avoid building 700 social homes in borough thanks to loophole

A legal loophole has allowed big developers in Kensington and Chelsea to avoid building over 700 social homes - enough to house those made homeless by the Grenfell fire.

New research by the homelessness charity Shelter has revealed that housing developers have exploited a legal loophole - called a ‘viability assessment’ - to avoid building 706 social homes in the London borough.

Housing developers win planning permission by promising to build a certain amount of affordable homes. However, the developers can use a ‘viability assessment’ to argue they are unable to build those homes because it would reduce their profit margins.

In Kensington and Chelsea, Shelter’s research found, the loophole has been used by developers to reduce the amount of affordable housing from the council’s policy target of 50% to only 15%.

This gap between the council’s target and what was eventually permitted is equivalent to 831 affordable homes, of which 706 would have been social homes.

‘At a time when we desperately need more affordable homes, big developers are allowed to prioritise their profits by building luxury housing while backtracking on their promises to build a fair share of affordable homes,’ Shelter chief executive, Polly Neate.

‘The government must make sure we treat affordable housing commitments as cast iron pledges, rather than optional extras, and act now to close the loophole that allows developers to wriggle out of building the affordable homes this country urgently needs.’

Responding to the findings, Cllr Elizabeth Campbell, leader of Kensington and Chelsea Council, said: 'Housing is a London-wide issue. All boroughs need to work together, and with developers, to ensure the capital has the right mix of housing.

'In places like Kensington and Chelsea, an independent viability report often results in the ability to build more homes, due to the sums of money developers have to pay instead of providing affordable housing on site.

'That said, we are getting tougher with developers to ensure that where affordable housing can be provided - it is. Grenfell has focussed everybody’s minds on the issue of housing and we want to find solutions.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Adoption Panel Member

Durham County Council
Being reviewed
Do you have experience, either professionally or personally or both, of children being cared for away from their birth family?   Are you passionate ab Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Housing Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £30,024 - £33,699
We currently have three opportunities for Housing Officers to join the team within Homeless Prevention. One vacancy is Temporary until 31st May 2027 a Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Attendance and Safeguarding Officer

Durham County Council
£28,142 - £31,022 pro rata (term time only plus two weeks)
Attendance and Safeguarding Officer Grade 6- £28,142 - £31,022 pro rata (term time only plus two weeks) Temporary- Full Time- Term Time Required from Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Senior Pracitioner - Family Centre, Colchester

Essex County Council
Up to £0.0000 per annum
Senior Pracitioner - Mulberry Tree Family Centre, ColchesterPermanent, Part Time (29.6 hours per week) £48,205 to £57,988 per annum (FTE)£38,564 to £4 England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities

Essex County Council
Up to £0.0000 per annum
Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities, North EssexPermanent, Full Time£36,124 to £51,834 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner