William Eichler 28 September 2017

Developers avoid building 700 social homes in borough thanks to loophole

A legal loophole has allowed big developers in Kensington and Chelsea to avoid building over 700 social homes - enough to house those made homeless by the Grenfell fire.

New research by the homelessness charity Shelter has revealed that housing developers have exploited a legal loophole - called a ‘viability assessment’ - to avoid building 706 social homes in the London borough.

Housing developers win planning permission by promising to build a certain amount of affordable homes. However, the developers can use a ‘viability assessment’ to argue they are unable to build those homes because it would reduce their profit margins.

In Kensington and Chelsea, Shelter’s research found, the loophole has been used by developers to reduce the amount of affordable housing from the council’s policy target of 50% to only 15%.

This gap between the council’s target and what was eventually permitted is equivalent to 831 affordable homes, of which 706 would have been social homes.

‘At a time when we desperately need more affordable homes, big developers are allowed to prioritise their profits by building luxury housing while backtracking on their promises to build a fair share of affordable homes,’ Shelter chief executive, Polly Neate.

‘The government must make sure we treat affordable housing commitments as cast iron pledges, rather than optional extras, and act now to close the loophole that allows developers to wriggle out of building the affordable homes this country urgently needs.’

Responding to the findings, Cllr Elizabeth Campbell, leader of Kensington and Chelsea Council, said: 'Housing is a London-wide issue. All boroughs need to work together, and with developers, to ensure the capital has the right mix of housing.

'In places like Kensington and Chelsea, an independent viability report often results in the ability to build more homes, due to the sums of money developers have to pay instead of providing affordable housing on site.

'That said, we are getting tougher with developers to ensure that where affordable housing can be provided - it is. Grenfell has focussed everybody’s minds on the issue of housing and we want to find solutions.'

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Worker (Link Role)

Essex County Council
£33049.00 - £37698.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Family Worker (Link Role)Permanent, Full Time£33,049 to £37,698 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Ugobus Driver - Clacton

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.0000 per annum
Ugobus Driver - ClactonPermanent, Term TimeUp to £25,959 per annum (full time equivalent)Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Ugobus Driver - Basildon

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.0000 per annum
Ugobus Driver - BasildonPermanent, Part TimeUp to £25,959 per annum (full time equivalent)Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Part Time, Weekend, Emergency Duty Service Out of Hours Advisor

Essex County Council
£25959.00 - £28621.00 per annum + Pro Rata
Part Time, Weekend, Emergency Duty Service Out of Hours AdvisorPermanent, Part Time£25,595 to £28,621 per annum, full time equivalentLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Practitioner - Emergency Duty Service

Essex County Council
£48205.0000 - £57988.0000 per annum
Senior Practitioner - Emergency Duty ServicePermanent, Full Time£48,205 to £57,988 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner