William Eichler 28 September 2017

Developers avoid building 700 social homes in borough thanks to loophole

A legal loophole has allowed big developers in Kensington and Chelsea to avoid building over 700 social homes - enough to house those made homeless by the Grenfell fire.

New research by the homelessness charity Shelter has revealed that housing developers have exploited a legal loophole - called a ‘viability assessment’ - to avoid building 706 social homes in the London borough.

Housing developers win planning permission by promising to build a certain amount of affordable homes. However, the developers can use a ‘viability assessment’ to argue they are unable to build those homes because it would reduce their profit margins.

In Kensington and Chelsea, Shelter’s research found, the loophole has been used by developers to reduce the amount of affordable housing from the council’s policy target of 50% to only 15%.

This gap between the council’s target and what was eventually permitted is equivalent to 831 affordable homes, of which 706 would have been social homes.

‘At a time when we desperately need more affordable homes, big developers are allowed to prioritise their profits by building luxury housing while backtracking on their promises to build a fair share of affordable homes,’ Shelter chief executive, Polly Neate.

‘The government must make sure we treat affordable housing commitments as cast iron pledges, rather than optional extras, and act now to close the loophole that allows developers to wriggle out of building the affordable homes this country urgently needs.’

Responding to the findings, Cllr Elizabeth Campbell, leader of Kensington and Chelsea Council, said: 'Housing is a London-wide issue. All boroughs need to work together, and with developers, to ensure the capital has the right mix of housing.

'In places like Kensington and Chelsea, an independent viability report often results in the ability to build more homes, due to the sums of money developers have to pay instead of providing affordable housing on site.

'That said, we are getting tougher with developers to ensure that where affordable housing can be provided - it is. Grenfell has focussed everybody’s minds on the issue of housing and we want to find solutions.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Transport and Major Work Manager

Slough Borough Council
£54,556 to £60,085 per year Inclusive of Local Weighting Allowance of £1096
Drive the future of transport and infrastructure in Slough Slough, Berkshire
Recuriter: Slough Borough Council

Head of Constitutional and Electoral Services

Redbridge London Borough Council
£89,037 - £92,538
This role will place you at the centre of political decision-making and governance in the Council. Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Community Safety

Redbridge London Borough Council
Up to £103,893 inc. market supplement
Redbridge is one of the most dynamic and diverse boroughs in London. Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Highways & Transport

Redbridge London Borough Council
£89,037 - £92,538
There is a lot going on in Redbridge. Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Local Audit Office - Controller of Local Audit

Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government
£200,000 - £220,000
The Government is taking bold steps to overhaul the local audit system, leading the most transformational reform programme in over a decade Birmingham, Leeds
Recuriter: Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government
Linkedin Banner