Mark Conrad 13 November 2009

Credit crunch research calls for re-think over PFI funding

Problems public bodies have encountered in delivering PFI projects during the recession are beginning to abate but the market still requires new sources of finance to ensure it remains stable, new research has suggested.
A study of the impact of the credit crunch on UK infrastructure projects, published by the Centre for Public Service Partnerships, has found that ‘conventionally procured’ projects, funded by public bodies directly, ‘have suffered the least difficulty’ during the downturn.
In contrast, the regeneration and housing sectors have been ‘particularly badly impaired’ and require further support to kick-start projects, the authors claim.
But while there are signs of the ‘green shoots’ of recovery across public-private programmes, the study urges a re-think over sources of PFI funding, particularly if local authorities are to continue to deliver affordable, privately funded projects such as new schools, hospitals and transport
systems.
According to researchers at the CPSP, based at the University of Birmingham, ‘One solution is to obtain access to institutional funding, for example, from pension funds and insurance companies.
‘In principle there is a close match between the funding requirements for PPP and PFI schemes, where affordable long-term finance is required, and the investment needs for pension funds which want long term, low risk investments,’ the research states.
Other solutions proposed by the CPSP include wider experimentation with hypothecated local taxes, such as the supplementary business rates currently being earmarked to fund London’s £16bn Crossrail programme.
Another hypothecated option endorsed by the academics is the introduction of tax incremental finance (TIF), or accelerated development zones, which draw forward regeneration investment based on projections of an area’s expected business tax revenues. More controversially, the academics also warn that ‘increased charging for services might be considered further’.
‘Whilst this could be introduced for a range of services, roads and motorways appear to be the most suitable areas. The increased use of road and congestion charging, possibly linked to hypothecated spending on specified improvements, could finance infrastructure improvements,’ they argue.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior/Principal Regeneration Officer

Fareham Borough Council
£45,465 - £55,379
Our town centre regeneration is moving from planning to delivery, and we're looking for someone who wants to help make regeneration happen. Fareham, Hampshire
Recuriter: Fareham Borough Council

Social Worker

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£40,260 - £54,507
Social Worker£... London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

S106 and Monitoring Officer

Essex County Council
£49435.1400 - £54930.6000 per annum
Maldon District Council is working in partnership with Essex Shared Services to support the recruitment of the role of a S106 and Monitoring Officer, England, Essex, Maldon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officer (Part Time)

Isle of Wight Council
Career Grade 3-6, £26,017 to £29,071 per annum pro-rata (actual salary £17,227.47 to £19,249.72)
The Benefits team is currently seeking a part-time Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officers Ryde, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council

Legal Officer

Isle of Wight Council
Grade 9, £35,572 to £38,726 per annum
Ideally you will be a qualified paralegal or will offer an equivalent qualification or experience. Newport, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council
Linkedin Banner