Chris Ames 06 November 2017

Councils should not take on 'large procurement projects'

The former convenor of Edinburgh council’s transport committee has told the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry that councils should not take on large public procurement projects like the city’s tram network, as the council advertised for contractors to build a £162m extension.

Gordon Ferguson, a former councillor and member of the Tram Project Board, gave evidence to the Inquiry on Wednesday (1 November).

In a written statement, he said: ‘I do not think that a political body, such as a Council, should take these types of projects forward; it creates too many opportunities for division and divulging information which may disadvantage the public purse.’

He added that he did not think councillors should have been on the various boards involved in the project, adding: ‘it created difficulties in terms of conflicts of interest, which we felt that we were managing at that time, but didn't generate sufficient benefit to offset the potential conflict. It would have been more sensible, that Councillors were not involved in those boards.’

The inquiry is looking into why the original project was delivered late and more than £200m over budget.

Cllr Lesley Macinnes, the current transport convener, said: ‘We welcome the Tram Inquiry and hope that any recommendations will benefit public bodies, especially local authorities, when it comes to the commissioning and carrying out of major infrastructure projects.

‘It is important to us that we have taken into account experience from the previous project which is being incorporated into our plans for the proposed new line to Newhaven. Edinburgh is a growing city which needs an integrated transport system delivered both effectively and efficiently and we will continue to co-operate fully with Lord Hardie and his team.’

The comments came after the council published two contract notices for work to build an extension costing a total £162m to Leith and Newhaven, to the north of the city, in advance of a final decision on the scheme next year.

A Swept Path Contract valued at £25m will engage a contractor ‘to clear the tram route of all below ground utilities and obstructions, including archaeology, either by means of diversion or removal’. The parameters of the area covered by this contraxt are to be defined by the contractor awarded the main Infrastructure and System Contract, valued at £90m.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Work Assistant

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022
We are looking to appoint a Social Work Assistant to work within the Easington Locality.   The team provides an effective and efficient Assessment and Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker For People with Dual Sensory Loss

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - Pre Progression (£35,412 - £39,152) - Grade 11 - Post Progression (£40,777 - £45,091)
Do you have experience of working with people who have dual sensory loss?  Are you a Social Worker or a Visual Impaired Rehabilitation Worker?   We ha Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Community Wellbeing Assistant

Durham County Council
£26,403 - £28,598
Temporary until March 2028 - 30 hour post  Wellbing Sport and Leisure are looking for a Wellbeing Assistant to join their team in the East and West o Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

School Administrator

Durham County Council
£26,403- £28,598 (Pro Rata)
School Administrator Grade 5, £26,403- £28,598 (Pro Rata) Permanent- Full Time- 37 hours per week. Required to start 1st September 2026, pending DBS c Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Residential Workers

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £30,024 - £33,699
Residential Workers - Opportunities are available across the County Durham Area Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner