William Eichler 01 April 2019

Council criticised for not carrying out ‘proper assessments’ in deprivation of liberty cases

Council criticised for not carrying out ‘proper assessments’ in deprivation of liberty cases   image

A council has argued that the legislation dealing with when it is legitimate to deprive someone of their liberty is ‘no longer fit for purpose’ after being criticised by the social care ombudsman.

An investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found that vulnerable young people may have been deprived of their liberty because Staffordshire County Council had not carried out ‘proper assessments’.

Local authorities need to carry out certain assessments before responding to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) requests by care homes and hospitals. These requests are made if it is believed depriving someone of their liberty is in that person’s best interests.

In May 2016, Staffordshire CC decided it would stop carrying out full assessments except in those cases it classified as high priority.

The council created its own guidance for ranking DoLS requests into three priority bands, based on guidance issued by the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS).

Ombudsman Michael King found, however, that the council was using an adapted version of this guidance which resulted in fewer requests being categorised as high priority — a move which resulted in fewer requests being properly assessed.

Mr King said that the council made the decision because of a lack of finances and was not complying with relevant legislation and statutory guidance.

At the end of June 2018, the council had a backlog of 3,033 DoLS requests for which it had not carried out the proper assessments, with some dating back to August 2014.

Since May 2016 the council told Mr King it has closed nearly 2,000 applications without assessment because a person had died before one could take place.

‘Resource constraints can never be a legitimate reason for not carrying out the assessments required by law or statutory guidance,’ said Mr King.

‘While councils may decide how to prioritise cases, it is not acceptable that the only way low and medium priority applications are resolved is because the people involved move away or die.

‘Because the council does not assess the majority of requests we simply do not know if there are people waiting in the backlog who are wrongly being deprived of their liberty when they actually have capacity, or when less restrictive options are available.’

Responding to the Ombudsman’s report, Alan White, deputy leader of Staffordshire County Council and cabinet member for health, care and wellbeing, said that ‘no-one’s life or health has been put at risk because of the assessment policy.’

‘The Government and the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services have backed a prioritising approach and it is generally accepted that the current DoLS legislation is no longer fit for purpose,’ he said.

‘Regarding the implications of the Ombudsman’s findings, I would emphasise that no-one has complained about the prioritisation scheme, no individual has actually suffered injustice and we are not being asked to change what we do on a day-to-day basis until it’s time to implement the recommendations of the Government’s amendment to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which will be next year at the earliest.’

The Ombudsman decided to investigate this matter after a complaint during which the council’s decision to focus the assessment process came to light.

The power of local systems to save lives image

The power of local systems to save lives

Councils and their partners could do even more to contain the spread of COVID-19 if properly funded to undertake a robust localised system of testing, tracking and tracing, argues Professor Donna Hall.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Adult Education Tutors Health & Leisure

City of York Council
Various
We are looking for appropriately qualified, motivated and inspiring people to teach online courses and workshops on a self-employed basis.  York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

Social Worker - Children and Families Hub

Essex County Council
Negotiable
In Essex County Council we are "Serious about Social Work". We have invested in our workforce and created a positive environment for our social worke England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Home Ownership Officer

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£29,000 - £39,200 per annum
Are you motivated by delivering excellent customer service, a varied workload and an opportunity to grow? Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Assistant Head of TriBorough Insurance

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£43,300 - £58,500 per annum
An opportunity to lead the Tri-Borough Insurance Service technical team reporting to the Head of Service. Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Educational Psychologist

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£41,200 - £55,800 per annum
Looking for a fully qualified educational psychologist registered with Social Work England, or eligible for such registration. Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue