William Eichler 05 November 2020

Copeland residents asked to consider new radioactive waste facility

A Working Group has been formed to start local engagement on whether Copeland could be a suitable location for a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) for higher activity radioactive waste.

The group, which will include Copeland Borough Council and Radioactive Waste Management (RWM), will engage with people in Copeland to canvass their views. Other groups could be invited to join, including representatives from the Cumbria Association of Local Councils (CALC).

The geographical area to be discussed will initially cover the whole of Copeland borough, but would exclude the Lake District National Park at the request of Copeland Borough Council and the interested parties. The potential for underground facilities off the coast, accessed from land, will also be considered.

‘Today marks the first step in a journey of several years, to determine whether a Geological Disposal Facility is right for Copeland,’ said Mark Cullinan, the independent chair of the Copeland GDF Working Group.

‘The infrastructure investment potential represented by such a facility could be transformational for the eventual host community – both directly through the construction and operation of the GDF and also potentially significant multi-million pounds of additional investment – but, of course, it would have to be right for the area.

‘I’m delighted to be joining the Copeland GDF Working Group as its independent chair, as we begin to talk to local people to understand the issues and opportunities and listen to their views.’

Cllr David Moore, Copeland Borough Council’s portfolio holder for nuclear services, commented: ‘Copeland Council’s participation in the Working Group means that the council, on behalf of our whole community, will play a key role in the process to establish whether there is a suitable location and willing host community for a GDF in Copeland.

‘Regardless of a final location for a GDF, the Copeland community is affected fundamentally as the vast majority of materials that would go for disposal are located here, and the Sellafield site will be at the front end of the operational phase for decades to come.

‘The fact that there are interested parties within the borough and now on the Working Group means that the time is right for Copeland – as a borough – to enter into the dialogue too. We set out our stall that the Lake District National Park should be excluded from any consideration, and I am pleased that this exclusion is fully established in the Working Group’s scope from the outset.’

Cllr Moore emphasised the importance of only going ahead with a GDF if it was backed by the residents of Copeland.

‘If there is a potentially suitable location and the process is taken forward, it would absolutely require the community’s support before any decisions were made,’ he said.

The MP for Copeland, Trudy Harrison, added: ‘Most of the material that would go into the GDF is already based here in Sellafield. A permanent place to deposit this material in Copeland would not only build on our heritage as the country’s nuclear experts, but it would also lay the ground for significant future investment in the region.

‘A GDF will be one of the biggest environmental protection projects of our lifetime. It will also be one of the largest planned infrastructure investments over the next 100 years, and the opportunity to host it here is one that we simply have to look at.

‘We need to look at a GDF in parallel with research and development into the future of nuclear materials at Sellafield and future nuclear power generation for West Cumbria, including new reactor technologies.’

Catastrophic system failure image

Catastrophic system failure

Mo Baines, chief executive of APSE, calls for an end to the hollowing out of public service capacity in light of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Planner (Development Management Wandsworth)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £30,483-£44,139 Depending on Skills
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Principal Planning Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £48,600-£58,893 Depending on Skills
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Pensions Officer

West Northamptonshire Council
£33369 - £36163
The Pensions Officer role sits within the Operations Team & is responsible for pension administration tasks including processing benefit calculations, data input and validation, responding to queries from members, employers, pensioners and dependents, pee Northampton
Recuriter: West Northamptonshire Council

Workshop Fitter (Temp) - Castle Point Borough Council

Essex County Council
Up to £16.0000 per hour
Workshop Fitter Canvey Island, Essex £16 per Hour Temporary Contract Closing Date
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Sustainable Transport Officer – Low Emission Vehicle Infrastructure

Derbyshire County Council
£30,054 - £31,963 per annum
Derbyshire County Council is looking for a dynamic and committed Sustainable Transport Officer. Matlock/Hybrid
Recuriter: Derbyshire County Council
Linkedin Banner

Partner Content

Circular highways is a necessity not an aspiration – and it’s within our grasp

Shell is helping power the journey towards a circular paving industry with Shell Bitumen LT R, a new product for roads that uses plastics destined for landfill as part of the additives to make the bitumen.

Support from Effective Energy Group for Local Authorities to Deliver £430m Sustainable Warmth Funded Energy Efficiency Projects

Effective Energy Group is now offering its support to the 40 Local Authorities who have received a share of the £430m to deliver their projects on the ground by surveying properties and installing measures.

Pay.UK – the next step in Bacs’ evolution

Dougie Belmore explains how one of the main interfaces between you and Bacs is about to change.