William Eichler 25 November 2016

Committee supports right of councils to run bus services

Council chiefs have welcomed a transport committee report which supports the right of local authorities to set up their own municipal bus companies.

The Bus Services Bill, which is currently being debated in Parliament, originally proposed to stop English local authorities from setting up new municipal companies.

However, Clause 21 of the Bill—the clause outlining this restriction—was dropped after the House of Lords rejected it.

The transport committee has welcomed the new version of the Bill, which frees councils up to run their own bus services, and said it would give a ‘boost to communities’.

Acknowledging there are some risks with councils setting up their own bus companies, the committee concluded that ‘existing safeguards in the Bill’ would protect against these.

‘In our view, it is primarily for the local transport authority to decide whether or not franchising is appropriate for any particular area and we agree with the majority in the Lords that the process set out in the Bill as introduced is unnecessarily cumbersome,’ the committee report concluded.

‘Councils need to have a bigger say in bus provision so they can help ensure communities get the services they need,’ said Cllr Martin Tett, the Local Government Association (LGA) transport spokesperson.

‘This is why we are pleased that the benefits of the Bus Services Bill are to be available everywhere and, as this Bill currently stands, that all councils will be able to automatically franchise bus services, not just those with directly-elected mayors.’

Cllr Tett also welcomed the removal of Clause 21 and described it as a ‘big step forward’.

Responding to the committee’s report, a spokesperson for campaign group We Own It said: ‘If the government wants councils to be able to negotiate the best deal for passengers, then the option of setting up a new public bus company needs to be on the table.

‘For far too long passengers have been at the mercy of private operators and if they don’t sort their act out it would be absurd if councils didn’t at least think about taking control of bus services by setting up a new bus company to do it themselves.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Financial Assessment Officer (Adult Social Care)

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Negotiable
Shape outcomes across two leading London councils as a Financial Assessment Officer, delivering vital support that makes a real difference to residents' lives. England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

No Wrong Door Team Manager – (Registered Children’s Home Manager)

North Yorkshire Council
£53,051 to £57,372 per annum
You will provide inspiring leadership, management and direction to staff, ensuring our culture, values and practice model Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Occupational Therapist

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Negotiable
Be part of a long-term complex occupational team that cares about patients and cares about you In Kensington and Chelsea, we support people's independence and wellbeing and work hard to enable them to live in the community with dignity, choice and cont England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Property Assistant

Durham County Council
£26,427 to £27,709 p.a. (Grade 4)
An opportunity has arisen within Corporate Property and Land for a part time, permanent Property Assistant based at Aycliffe Secure Centre in Newton A Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Community Wellbeing Assistant

Durham County Council
£27,274 - £29,542
Temporary until March 2028  2 x 15 hours posts   Wellbing Sport and leisure are looking for 2 x 15 hours Wellbeing Assistant to join their team in th Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner