William Eichler 25 November 2016

Committee supports right of councils to run bus services

Council chiefs have welcomed a transport committee report which supports the right of local authorities to set up their own municipal bus companies.

The Bus Services Bill, which is currently being debated in Parliament, originally proposed to stop English local authorities from setting up new municipal companies.

However, Clause 21 of the Bill—the clause outlining this restriction—was dropped after the House of Lords rejected it.

The transport committee has welcomed the new version of the Bill, which frees councils up to run their own bus services, and said it would give a ‘boost to communities’.

Acknowledging there are some risks with councils setting up their own bus companies, the committee concluded that ‘existing safeguards in the Bill’ would protect against these.

‘In our view, it is primarily for the local transport authority to decide whether or not franchising is appropriate for any particular area and we agree with the majority in the Lords that the process set out in the Bill as introduced is unnecessarily cumbersome,’ the committee report concluded.

‘Councils need to have a bigger say in bus provision so they can help ensure communities get the services they need,’ said Cllr Martin Tett, the Local Government Association (LGA) transport spokesperson.

‘This is why we are pleased that the benefits of the Bus Services Bill are to be available everywhere and, as this Bill currently stands, that all councils will be able to automatically franchise bus services, not just those with directly-elected mayors.’

Cllr Tett also welcomed the removal of Clause 21 and described it as a ‘big step forward’.

Responding to the committee’s report, a spokesperson for campaign group We Own It said: ‘If the government wants councils to be able to negotiate the best deal for passengers, then the option of setting up a new public bus company needs to be on the table.

‘For far too long passengers have been at the mercy of private operators and if they don’t sort their act out it would be absurd if councils didn’t at least think about taking control of bus services by setting up a new bus company to do it themselves.’

Devolution and putting place first image

Devolution and putting place first

The real lesson of Andy Burnham's Makerfield success, argues Dr Jonathan Carr-West, is that place – not personality – is the key to Britain's future.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Practitioner - Children in Care - North Essex

Essex County Council
£48205.0000 - £57988.0000 per annum
Senior Practitioner - Children in Care - North EssexPermanent, Full Time£48,205 to £57,988 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Coroners Coordinator

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £26632.0000 per annum
Coroners CoordinatorPermanent, Full Time£25,959 to £26,632 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Adults Social Worker - Discharge to Assess

Essex County Council
£38487 - £51834 per annum
Interviews will be held in person at Rowan House, Colchester in late July 2026.This advert is open to Experienced Qualified Social Worker's About Our England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Organisational Development Adviser

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
43545 - 55992
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

School Crossing Patroller

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Pro Rata Salary - £5353,77
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner