William Eichler 25 November 2016

Committee supports right of councils to run bus services

Council chiefs have welcomed a transport committee report which supports the right of local authorities to set up their own municipal bus companies.

The Bus Services Bill, which is currently being debated in Parliament, originally proposed to stop English local authorities from setting up new municipal companies.

However, Clause 21 of the Bill—the clause outlining this restriction—was dropped after the House of Lords rejected it.

The transport committee has welcomed the new version of the Bill, which frees councils up to run their own bus services, and said it would give a ‘boost to communities’.

Acknowledging there are some risks with councils setting up their own bus companies, the committee concluded that ‘existing safeguards in the Bill’ would protect against these.

‘In our view, it is primarily for the local transport authority to decide whether or not franchising is appropriate for any particular area and we agree with the majority in the Lords that the process set out in the Bill as introduced is unnecessarily cumbersome,’ the committee report concluded.

‘Councils need to have a bigger say in bus provision so they can help ensure communities get the services they need,’ said Cllr Martin Tett, the Local Government Association (LGA) transport spokesperson.

‘This is why we are pleased that the benefits of the Bus Services Bill are to be available everywhere and, as this Bill currently stands, that all councils will be able to automatically franchise bus services, not just those with directly-elected mayors.’

Cllr Tett also welcomed the removal of Clause 21 and described it as a ‘big step forward’.

Responding to the committee’s report, a spokesperson for campaign group We Own It said: ‘If the government wants councils to be able to negotiate the best deal for passengers, then the option of setting up a new public bus company needs to be on the table.

‘For far too long passengers have been at the mercy of private operators and if they don’t sort their act out it would be absurd if councils didn’t at least think about taking control of bus services by setting up a new bus company to do it themselves.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Erase Assistant Team Manager

Durham County Council
Grade 10 £38,220 - £41,771
Are you passionate about improving outcomes for teenagers at risk of exploitation, missing episodes and harm outside the home?   Durham Children's Ser Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant – SEN

Durham County Council
£28,142 to £31,022 (Pro rata)
Permanent Contract- Full Time 37 hours per week- Monday 8.10am to 4pm Tuesday 8.10am to 4pm Wednesday 8.10am to 4.40pm Thursday 8.10am to 4pm Friday 8 Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisor

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro Rata)
7.5 hours per week (11
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Temporary Contract until 12th February 2027. Part Time – 7hrs 30mins a week (11.45am to 1.15pm Mon-Fri)   We are looking for a Lunchtime Supervisor to Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Head of Finance - Children & Young People’s Service

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£75,585 - £80,726 (pay award pending)
This is a great place to work for people who want to make a real difference. Riverside House, Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Linkedin Banner