William Eichler 08 June 2021

BCP Council agrees to check past payments to foster carers

BCP Council agrees to check past payments to foster carers image

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council has agreed to check whether it has paid friends and family foster carers properly over the past five years following an investigation.

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has asked the council to consider backdating fostering allowances to carers after it received a complaint from the relatives of two vulnerable children who believed they had not been supported properly.

The relatives had taken in the children after the siblings’ parents were unable to look after them. The children were deemed at risk, and were on Child Protection Plans, due to their parents’ problems, and their unsafe living environment.

At the time, the council considered it was a private arrangement between the children's parents and the relatives. This meant the family carers were not provided with appropriate assistance from the council, and the children missed out on the support to which they were entitled as ‘looked after children’.

The relatives complained to the council and the council’s own investigation found it was at fault. It offered them a significant sum as a token payment for the financial impact of caring for the children, and for the cost of the therapy the children needed. However, it still did not accept it had been responsible for placing the children in their relatives’ care.

The Ombudsman found the council had been actively involved in the case, including involving the Police, and so the relatives should have been entitled to the council’s support.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, commented: ‘Children cared for by friends and family foster carers are often some of the most vulnerable in society: so it is vital that those looking after them receive the full support to which they are entitled.

‘In this case it is quite clear that had the relatives not taken the children under their wings, they would have needed state care, so the council should have treated their relatives as friends and family foster carers.

‘It is to the council’s credit that it has readily accepted my recommendations, and I hope the changes it will now make will ensure relatives’ situations are made clear when they take on the role of foster parents in future.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Highways Adoption Engineer

Durham County Council
Grade 8 ( £32,597 - £36,363) Grade 9 (£35,412 - £39,152) Grade 10 (£38,220 - £41,771)
We are seeking to recruit a Highways Adoption Engineer (Career Graded). Your primary role will be to ensure that all new roads built within the County Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Highways Assets Technical Officer

Durham County Council
£35,412 - £39,152
We are seeking to recruit a Highway Assets Technical Officer whose primary responsibility will be to ensure that Highways Asset Management is delivere Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Contracts Administrator

Durham County Council
Grade 5 £26,403 - £28,598
A vacancy has arisen within Business Services for a full-time Contracts Assistant. This is initially temporary for 18 months. This is an exciting opp Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Homelessness Prevention and Solutions Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£38,976 to £47,229 per annum
We are looking for a capable and ambitious individual keen to help families and individuals facing homelessness to help support them in their homelessness journey and adhere to legislative guidance as well as policy and procedures. Who are we looking fo Twickenham
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Waste Management Officer - North Herts Council

Essex County Council
Up to £13.5000 per hour
Waste Management Officer - North Herts CouncilGrade 4 - £13.50 PAYE37 per week2-3 Months ContractImmediate StartLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner