William Eichler 08 June 2021

BCP Council agrees to check past payments to foster carers

BCP Council agrees to check past payments to foster carers image

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council has agreed to check whether it has paid friends and family foster carers properly over the past five years following an investigation.

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has asked the council to consider backdating fostering allowances to carers after it received a complaint from the relatives of two vulnerable children who believed they had not been supported properly.

The relatives had taken in the children after the siblings’ parents were unable to look after them. The children were deemed at risk, and were on Child Protection Plans, due to their parents’ problems, and their unsafe living environment.

At the time, the council considered it was a private arrangement between the children's parents and the relatives. This meant the family carers were not provided with appropriate assistance from the council, and the children missed out on the support to which they were entitled as ‘looked after children’.

The relatives complained to the council and the council’s own investigation found it was at fault. It offered them a significant sum as a token payment for the financial impact of caring for the children, and for the cost of the therapy the children needed. However, it still did not accept it had been responsible for placing the children in their relatives’ care.

The Ombudsman found the council had been actively involved in the case, including involving the Police, and so the relatives should have been entitled to the council’s support.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, commented: ‘Children cared for by friends and family foster carers are often some of the most vulnerable in society: so it is vital that those looking after them receive the full support to which they are entitled.

‘In this case it is quite clear that had the relatives not taken the children under their wings, they would have needed state care, so the council should have treated their relatives as friends and family foster carers.

‘It is to the council’s credit that it has readily accepted my recommendations, and I hope the changes it will now make will ensure relatives’ situations are made clear when they take on the role of foster parents in future.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Worker - Adoption Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£36124.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker - Adoption Mid EssexPermanent, Full Time - 37 hours per week£36,124 to £51,834 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Social Worker - Learning Disability & Autism

Essex County Council
£48205.0000 - £57988.0000 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
Senior Social Worker - Learning Disability & AutismPermanent, Full Time£48,205 to £57,988 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Finance Officer - Income Collection

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £28621.0000 per annum
Finance Officer - Income CollectionFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 to £28,621 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Democratic Services Officer

Essex County Council
£30295.0000 - £35641.0000 per annum
Democratic Services OfficerSecondment, Full Time£30,295 to £35,641 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Democratic Services Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£47,730 - £57,837
Democratic Services Officer
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner