Nick Appleyard 17 January 2013

XXX1

Concern has been raised that a fresh drive to reduce planning guidance could isolate council officers working in planning and technical services departments.

Lord Taylor's review of planning practise guidance, published by the DCLG on December 21, called for advice to be streamlined and made simpler. The Liberal Democrat peer’s call follows recent reforms made to the national planning policy framework, which was reduced from more than 1,000 pages to just 52.

Documents aligned for the chop in the Taylor Review include:

  • Good practice guidelines: delivering travel plans through the planning process (2009) and Guidance on transport assessments (2007), which the peer said should be scrapped and replaced with new 'streamlined' guidance.
  • DfT circular 02/2007planning and the strategic road network, which was dubbed out of date and should be cancelled.
  • Manual for streets (2007), which was described as 'some good advice but no needed in this format'. Lord Taylor suggested this document should be reviewed and broken down into planning advice and other guidance.

The Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation (CIHT) has warned ministers they must ensure all new guidance continues to provide integration across different sectors – notably planning and engineering.

Acknowledging the need for 'simpler, more accessible' guidance, CIHT chief executive Sue Percy raised concerns about some advice, which could be lost.

She told Surveyor: 'There are concerns on the impact of reducing such a wide range of guidance into a few core documents. Questions remain regarding what will happen to many of the legacy documents that do provide integration across the sector.

'The appendix outlines the potential redrafting of manual for streets. CIHT believes that manual for streets 1 and 2 are documents that provide guidance for planners, engineers and other professionals from across the built environment and any redrafting must continue to provide this cross sector support.

'CIHT believes that it is essential that the links between important elements of the PPGs [planning practise guidance] are picked up in the new guidance and that the integration of planning and transport is covered. CIHT believe that we must ensure that we do not revert back to planning for cars in the way we did in the 20th century.

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner