Ben Page 17 July 2008

Soap Box

Last week’s Community Empowerment White Paper gave us the Government’s views on ‘empowerment’. Many of the suggestions were concepts the best councils have already been incorporating for some time. 
Huge benefits are claimed for empowerment. It is seen as resulting in better services – but it is also claimed to increase community cohesion, individuals’ skills and confidence, and trust in local and national government.
But does it actually work?
This is harder to answer. Extensive reviews have all decided it probably does, but that it can’t be proved.
Ipsos MORI’s view is there are positive benefits, but one must have realistic expectations. People who feel they can influence local decisions do tend to be more satisfied with their area. But feeling safe, not having problems with gangs, drugs or vandalism, and knowing your neighbours have more impact on how happy people are with their areas. Some areas which appear to be models of empowerment, have fairly poor results on quality of life. Our surveys also reveal that feeling you can influence things if you need to are more important than actual involvement.
CLG also needs to remember that having lots of people who want to get involved locally is often more a sign of failure than success. Time and again in our work for local councils we see people are more likely to want to get involved where they are least satisfied with local services. 
Which leads to another key question – do people actually want to be empowered? 
Only a small minority want to be actively involved, with a larger minority at the other end who have no interest at all, and the vast majority in the middle, who would like more say, but not much more responsibility.  
So, we consistently see that around 80% will support more community involvement when asked, around one-quarter will say they personally want to get more involved – but when it comes to it, only 1-2% act.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Finance Officer - 12 month Fixed Term Contract

Essex County Council
£25081.00 - £27653.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Finance OfficerFixed Term, Full Time£25,081 to £27,653 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Tutor

Essex County Council
Up to £30377.00 per annum + Pension
TutorPermanent, Part Time£30,377 per annum full time equivalent Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Principal Highway Engineer – Highway Condition Specialist

W.D.M. Limited
£65,000 - £80,000 based on experience
We are looking for a driven and experienced Professional Civil Engineer with a strong background in highways engineering to join our team. Bristol
Recuriter: W.D.M. Limited

Deputy Head of Pensions

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£48,873 - £62,451 dependents on experience
The Pensions Finance team has a variety of work shared in a small team giving the opportunity to get involved in every area. The team provides financial and investment support to Wandsworth Council’s £3bn pension fund, the Southwest Middlesex Cremato Wandsworth, London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adults Social Worker - Forensic Mental Health

Essex County Council
£37185 - £50081 per annum + Flexible Working
This position is open to Newly Qualified Social Worker's (NQSW) with relevant experience in Mental Health. The starting salary for NQSW's is £34,902 England, Essex, Wickford
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner