John Ransford 12 September 2007

PluggedIn

It is difficult to be objective about the reward we receive for our work. It really is a challenge for employer or employee to balance fairness, affordability, consistency and transparency in a way that is accepted by all. A fair day’s work for a day’s pay may have spiritual, economic and social credibility, but it’s usually the start of an evaluation, not a clinching consensus.
Two factors have led me to ponder on all this in the past few weeks. First, I have been involved in trying to resolve the impasse in this year’s pay award for local government staff.
I accept fully this has all been extremely difficult for staff and their trade unions as they stare at a below-inflation solution, whatever statistics are used. Forty years ago, I struggled, as a student of economics, with the conundrum of whether pay increases fuel inflation or vice versa. I know that the issues are too complicated on which to base glib conclusions.
Second, there has been simultaneous publicity about bonuses for City workers, based on provisional figures from the Office for National Statistics, no less. Apparently bonuses are likely to exceed £14bn this year, and director’s performance pay will reach £26bn. I have seen one estimate that all this equates to £5,000 each for the lowest 20% of earners among British workers as a whole.
The justification for the status quo is that entrepreneurs and wealth-creators need major incentives to succeed. Therefore, extra rewards are fine if they are paid out of profits. Public sector pay must always be restrained as it is financed by national and local taxes, or so the argument goes.
All pay increases have to be paid by someone, through prices or taxes. The growth in central London home prices at the top end and the demand for luxury goods suggests that the material benefits of all this are profound.
There should be no stomach for a return to centrally-determined pay restraint. However, there does need to be sense and proportion in the arguments deployed.
Sustained economic growth is important for us all, but so are good-quality public services, largely provided by relatively-low paid staff. Resolving these issues is not easy, but please let us keep a sense of proportion. n
John Ransford is deputy chief executive of the Local Government Association
LGOF: Will it work? image

LGOF: Will it work?

Dr Jonathan Carr-West, LGIU, discusses the Local Government Outcomes Framework (LGOF), the latest instalment in the history of local government accountability.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Teaching Assistant - SENSS Ormerod Resource Base

Oxfordshire County Council
£25992 - £28163
About usThe SENSS Ormer... Woodstock
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Caretaker/Cleaner

Ashfield District Council
£13,400 - £13,612 per annum (pay award pending)
Predominantly, you will be working alone, so knowledge of Lone Working is essential. Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Coastal Processes Scientist

North Yorkshire Council
£37,035 to £41,511 per annum
Are you passionate about protecting and enhancing our stunning coastline? Scarborough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Development Engineer

London Borough of Bexley
£35,967 - £41,268 per annum
Are you ready to play a key role in shaping and safeguarding the future of our highways and public spaces? Bexley (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Bexley

Lawyer 1 - Litigation

Herefordshire Council
£39,513 - £43,693
We are looking for a fresh thinking and enthusiastic Litigation Lawyer to join our dedicated and friendly Litigation Team within Legal Services. Hereford, Herefordshire
Recuriter: Herefordshire Council
Linkedin Banner