Tiffany Cloynes 23 October 2018

Making use of empty homes

Making use of empty homes image

In many areas demand for housing is high and local authorities are under pressure to meet their responsibilities but there are also many empty homes.

The situation has prompted the deputy leader of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea to call for a change in the law to give local authorities more access to homes that are not being used.

Local authorities currently have power to control the use of empty homes by applying to a residential property for an empty dwelling management order under the Housing Act 2004. However, this is only possible if a residential property in private ownership has been empty for at least two years and has been causing a nuisance for the community.

There is also a requirement for a local authority to obtain an interim order which can last for up to twelve months. During that time, the local authority must work with the owner to try to agree a way to bring the property back into use. If no agreement is reached during this time, the local authority may make a final order, which can last for up to seven years. With a final order, the local authority may find a tenant without obtaining the owner’s permission.

The proposals from Kensington and Chelsea are that the requirement for homes to be causing a nuisance should be relaxed, that local authorities should be able to levy a management fee and that owners should benefit from a favourable taxation scheme on the income provided to them by tenants via managing local authorities if they allow local authorities to let their properties.

The changes proposed by Kensington and Chelsea might lead to an increase in empty dwelling management orders and so could help to reduce the number of empty homes. In a letter to the housing minister, the council’s deputy leader has said that there are 621 properties in the borough that have been empty and unfurnished for more than two years.

However, some people are opposed to the principle of local authorities having the right to make empty dwelling management orders at all, arguing that this is an attack on the civil liberties of property owners. Such critics might see any lessening in the criteria for the orders as further weakening property owners’ rights.

The use of a favourable tax scheme might have a deterrent effect on property owners who might have sold their properties or made them available for rent even without such incentives. The prospect of a favourable tax position might encourage such owners to wait and to allow their local authorities to let their properties, so leading to a delay in housing being made available and extra administration for local authorities in letting houses which might have come to the market even without their intervention.

Also, whilst local authorities might find it helpful to have access to a greater number of dwellings, they might incur costs in taking possession of properties and taking any action necessary to make them fit for tenants to inhabit. They can recover their costs from the rent received from tenants but they need to have the funds to pay them in the first place. This might be challenging for local authorities who already deal with intense pressure on their resources.

There needs to be a range of action to address housing needs. For example, the Government’s decision to remove the Housing Revenue Account borrowing cap could lead to local authorities being involved in building more homes.

A change in the law on empty dwelling management orders could have a role to play in a range of actions but the potential practical implications of such a change need to be recognised.

Tiffany Cloynes is a partner at Geldards

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Commissioning Support Officer - MH & LD

Camden London Borough Council
£30,893 - £35,488
This role will primarily focus on supporting the commissioning team to develop and monitor mental health and learning disability services, as... Camden, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Camden London Borough Council

Travel Options Manager

Camden London Borough Council
£37,638 - £43,659 per annum
The role will work closely with internal and external stakeholders in developing Travel Options, policies, and procedures with... Camden, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Camden London Borough Council

Forensic Senior Social Worker

Suffolk County Council
£33,782 - £39,759 per annum *plus £2,772 per annum AMHP Honorarium
An exciting opportunity has arisen to join the joint Suffolk County Council (SCC) and Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust (NSFT) as... Suffolk
Recuriter: Suffolk County Council

Adult Senior Social Worker (Mental Health, Learning Disabilities and Autism)

Suffolk County Council
£33,782 - £39,759 pro rata
Do you want to join a thriving, enthusiastic and creative service? Suffolk
Recuriter: Suffolk County Council

Adult Social Worker (Mental Health, Learning Disabilities and Autism)

Suffolk County Council
£30,451 - £33,782 pro rata
 We are looking to recruit social workers, who have a strong commitment to supporting their local communities and... Suffolk
Recuriter: Suffolk County Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue