Laura Sharman 24 September 2018

Government accused of allocating council funding by ‘political convenience’

The Government has been accused of adjusting financial settlements in favour of the wealthiest authorities by a coalition of urban councils.

SIGOMA is calling on the Government to drop plans to allocate £153m to some of the country’s wealthiest authorities in this year’s Local Government Finance Settlement through the negative revenue support grant.

It warned that deprived councils outside of London will have lost £1bn since 2010 due to this proposal and other similar policy decisions.

Cllr Stephen Houghton, leader of Barnsley Council and head of the group, said: ‘These latest proposals are the final straw in a pattern of policymaking that has consistently adjusted settlements in favour of some of the wealthiest parts of the country and forced our councils to cut further and faster than most.

‘Local government finance isn’t the most exciting subject, so these issues are easily swept under the rug due to the technical jargon that surrounds them.’

He highlighted the fact that areas such as Knowsley and South Tyneside will receive no funding from this change despite seeing their core funding cut by 30%. However, Surrey will receive £27m from the proposal even though its core funding has only been cut by 4%.

Cllr Houghton added: ‘We want to see the Government allocate any additional money to local government based on need, not political convenience. The £153m they are proposing to gift to wealthy authorities this time has the technical guise ‘elimination of negative revenue support grant’ but there is no logic to it and it is going largely where it is least needed.

'It is £153m they could have allocated to support chronically underfunded children’s services, rather than playing favourites.'

An MHCLG spokesman said: 'Although the Government has a preferred option for resolving this issue, we recognise there are a range of views across the sector on the issue of Negative RSG.

'The consultation has laid out in detail alternative approaches we have considered and we have welcomed all representations on this issue. We will closely consider the responses received.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Support Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 6 - £27,269 - £30,060 (Pay award pending)
Do you have a real passion for helping families to make positive changes for themselves and their children? This might be the right role for you!   WH Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Clerical Officer Receptionist

Durham County Council
Grade 3 £24,404 - £25,183 Pro Rata to hours worked Pay award pending
WHAT IS INVOLVED? We are looking to appoint a part time Clerical officer/Receptionist within Business Services to provide a professional, effective a Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Administration Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711 pro rata
Administration Assistant Grade 5    £25,584 - £27,711 pro rata Temporary – required from 1st October 2025 until 31 December 2025 37 hours per week, Te Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Support Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
Support Assistant Grade 1 £24,027 pro rata Temporary – required from 1st October 2025 until 31st October 2026 Part Time, 32.5 hours Mon - Fri 9am -4pm Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lecturer in Foundation Learning -Maths, English and Digital

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £34,314 - £37,938 pro rata for part-time term time working PAY AWARD PENDING
The DurhamLearn Foundation Learning programme area delivers Digital Skills, English and Maths Functional Skills.   An opportunity has arisen for a Lec Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner