Laura Sharman 01 September 2016

EU referendum suffered ‘glaring democratic deficiencies’

A ‘root and branch review’ of the role and conduct of referendums is needed to ensure errors made during the EU vote are not repeated, say campaign group.

The Electoral Reform Society (ERS) published their report into the conduct of the European Union (EU) referendum today, which claims the debate suffered from ‘glaring democratic deficiencies’.

Polling, published in the report, shows many people felt ill-informed about the debate. It also reveals many felt the ‘big beast’ personalities did not engage or convince voters.

The ERS’ poll findings also demonstrate voters viewed both sides as increasingly negative as the campaign progressed.

The report, entitled It’s Good to Talk: doing referendums differently after the EU vote, compared the EU vote negatively to the Scottish independence referendum, which it says featured a ‘vibrant, well-informed, grassroots conversation that left a lasting legacy of on-going public participation in politics and public life’.

Katie Ghose, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society, said: ‘This report shows without a shadow of a doubt just how dire the EU referendum debate really was.

‘There were glaring democratic deficiencies in the run-up to the vote, with the public feeling totally ill-informed. Both sides were viewed as highly negative by voters, while the top-down, personality-based nature of the debate failed to address major policies and issues, leaving the public in the dark.’

‘It’s time for a root and branch review of referendums, learning the lessons of the EU campaign to make sure the mistakes that were made in terms of regulation, tone and conduct are never repeated,’ she added.

‘Let’s make sure that future referendums guarantee the lively and well-informed discussion that voters deserve.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Practice Supervisor

North Yorkshire Council
£47,181 - £51,356 per annum, pro rata
The service very much promotes flexible working with the ability to work remotely from other bases, as well as working from home Richmond, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Practice Supervisor

North Yorkshire Council
£47,181 - £51,356 per annum, pro rata
The service very much promotes flexible working with the ability to work remotely from other bases, as well as working from home Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Legal Assistant Litigation

Durham County Council
£30,024 to £33,699 p.a. (Grade 7)
The Council’s Regulatory & Enforcement team is expanding and is looking to appoint a legal assistant to support and enhance its litigation work.   WHA Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Customer Services Assistants

Durham County Council
£24,790 to £25,992 p.a. (Grade 4)
A vacancy has arisen within Transactional and Customer Services for two  Customer Services Assistant working full time, 37 hours per week. Your primar Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Litigation Lawyer

Durham County Council
£47,181 to £51,356 p.a. (Grade 13)
The Council’s Regulatory & Enforcement team is expanding and is looking to appoint a lawyer to support and enhance its litigation work.   WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner