Hiba Mahamadi 04 December 2019

Councils could lose millions in utilities repayments after court ruling

Local authorities could be facing repayments worth millions of pounds to council tenants in excess water charges, after a High Court ruling last week.

The court found Kingston upon Thames RLBC unlawfully over-charged a council tenant for water between 2003 and 2017.

During this period, the authority collected payments for water and sewerage services from its tenants for Thames Water Utilities. But the water company had offered the council a discount on the overall bill payable: 3.5% off the total charges, plus 9.3% off the remaining sum payable. This meant Kingston was paying a reduced sum of money for water bills over this period. 

The tenant, Derek Moss, argued this discount was not reflected in the council’s water bill to tenants. He added the council should only charge him for the water he used as per his tenancy agreement and return the discounted sum. 

The High Court ruled in favour of Mr Moss, noting he has the right to be reimbursed for the extra money paid to the council over the years.

Mr Justice Morgan wrote: “Mr Moss has a right to recover overpayments of charges pursuant to section 150(5) of the 1991 Act and paragraph 10(1) of the Water Resale Order 2006…

“Mr Moss has overpaid the charges which were due under the revised terms of his tenancy agreement”.

The judgement comes after a similar resolution against Southwark LBC in 2016, in which the council was held liable to repay a tenant for excess water charges.

Southwark calculated its tenants had made overpayments worth £28.6m.

The law firm, Deighton Pierce Glynn (DPG), that represented the tenants against Kingston RLBC and Southwark LBC, has said the ruling could see many more council tenants make claims for extra water charges.

A DPG statement read: 'The impact of today’s result could be felt in millions of pounds of refunds to council tenants in Kingston and many other local authority areas.'

DPG solicitor Daniel Carey added the ruling reiterated local authorities’ duty to pass on any discounts negotiated with water companies to tenants.

A spokesman for Kingston upon Thames RLBC said: 'We are considering the outcome with our legal representatives.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Finance Officer - 12 month Fixed Term Contract

Essex County Council
£25081.00 - £27653.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Finance OfficerFixed Term, Full Time£25,081 to £27,653 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Principal Highway Engineer – Highway Condition Specialist

W.D.M. Limited
£65,000 - £80,000 based on experience
We are looking for a driven and experienced Professional Civil Engineer with a strong background in highways engineering to join our team. Bristol
Recuriter: W.D.M. Limited

Deputy Head of Pensions

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£48,873 - £62,451 dependents on experience
The Pensions Finance team has a variety of work shared in a small team giving the opportunity to get involved in every area. The team provides financial and investment support to Wandsworth Council’s £3bn pension fund, the Southwest Middlesex Cremato Wandsworth, London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adults Social Worker - Forensic Mental Health

Essex County Council
£37185 - £50081 per annum + Flexible Working
This position is open to Newly Qualified Social Worker's (NQSW) with relevant experience in Mental Health. The starting salary for NQSW's is £34,902 England, Essex, Wickford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Policy and Procedure Coordinator

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152
Policy and procedure coordinator 18.5 hours ( working pattern to be agreed)   Are you a qualified Social Worker with experience of working with childr Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner