Mark Whitehead 19 October 2017

Council liable for foster care abuse, judge rules

Local authorities could face a big increase in claims by foster children over historic or recent child abuse after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court.

Lawyers warned councils may now have to award foster parents holiday and sick pay as the ruling meant they could now be classed as 'workers'.

Former foster child Natasha Armes from Nottingham won her case against Nottinghamshire County Council after judges ruled it was liable for abuse she suffered as a child 30 years ago.

They found that even though the council was not negligent in choosing or supervising the foster parents, it was 'vicariously liable' for the physical and sexual abuse they committed.

The ruling overturned previous decisions against Ms Armes at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

In the judgment Lord Reed said the local authority carried out the recruitment, selection and training of foster parents, paid their expenses and supervised the fostering.

The 'foster parents with which the present case is concerned cannot be regarded as carrying on an independent business of their own', he said.

'Although the picture presented is not without complexity, nevertheless when considered as a whole it points toward the conclusion that the foster parents provided care to the child as an integral part of the local authority's organisation of its child care services.'

Ms Armes' lawyers said the judgment had 'finally put right a terrible injustice which has denied so many victims a legal redress that is widely available to other survivors of abuse.'

They added: 'This removes the arbitrary distinction which meant local authorities could be held vicariously liable for abuse if it took place in a children's home, but not if it took place in a foster carer's home.'

The judges said the next stage of the litigation was for damages to be assessed.

Colin Pettigrew, corporate director for children and families at Nottinghamshire County Council, said: 'Ms Armes should have been safe in the care of her foster carers 30 years ago and she wasn’t, this is a matter of huge regret to us.

'We, of course, accept the findings of the Supreme Court and will be working with Ms Armes' representatives to resolve any outstanding issues related to our liability.

'This Supreme Court determination will have far-reaching implications for us and every other local authority across the land which has children’s social care responsibilities.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Residential Worker

Essex County Council
£27934.00 - £35344.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Residential WorkerPermanent, Full Time£27,934 up to £35,344 Per Annum (includes allowance) equal to £14.48 to £18.32 Per HourLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Early Years Keyworker

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£37,068 - £38,058
Want to make a difference for children with special educational needs in Greenwich? Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Early Years Area SENCo

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£39,855 - £42,324
Have you got extensive experience in working within Early Years, with a clear understanding of child development Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Young Persons Substance Misuse Service Pathfinder

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£31,524 - £32,931
Are you looking to change the lives of young people? Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Senior Regulatory Compliance Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£37,068 - £38,058
You will be an apprentice embedded within the Trading Standards team. Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Linkedin Banner