Ellie Ames 22 August 2023

City Hall accused of countering science on ULEZ

City Hall accused of countering science on ULEZ  image
Image: Frederic Legrand - COMEO / Shutterstock.com.

Sadiq Khan’s office has been accused of trying to counter scientists who suggested that the London Mayor’s ultra low emission zone (ULEZ) policy had little impact on pollution.

Private emails between the mayor’s office and an academic were seen by The Telegraph.

In the emails, Shirley Rodrigues, the London Mayor’s deputy for environment and energy, told Frank Kelly, an Imperial College professor, to counter research, covered in the media, that questioned the effectiveness of ULEZ.

The research was by Imperial’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Mr Kelly, a director of Imperial’s Environmental Research Group, agreed to issue a statement which said ULEZ had ‘dramatically reduced air pollution in London’.

Peter Fortune, Conservative London Assembly Member for Bexley and Bromley, said Khan’s ‘office tried to silence Imperial scientists whose research cast doubt on the Ulez scheme’s impact on health’.

In response, a spokesperson for the mayor said: ‘It is right - and standard practice across government - that we commission experts to carry out research to inform the work we do.

‘Frank Kelly and the Environmental Research Group at Imperial are some of the world-leading academic institutions looking at air quality. It is normal and proper to work with these experts to ensure our policies are as effective as possible at dealing with issues such as the high number of deaths – up to 4,000 a year – linked to toxic air in London every year.

‘The ULEZ analysis from the engineering department at Imperial only paints a partial picture, not accounting for the full lifetime impact of the scheme, and only focusing on its immediate impact around its launch.

‘It is commonplace for academic experts to disagree with how other academic studies are interpreted, as was the case here.’

If this article was of interest, then check out our features, 'Now I am become Uxbridge, destroyer of rational climate discourse' and 'Home County drivers face taxation without representation'.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Residential Worker

Durham County Council
£30,024 - £33,699 plus allowances
WHAT WE DO MATTERS The team at Aycliffe Secure Centre provide a caring, trauma informed and aspirational environment for young people aged between 10 Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Occupational Therapist

Oxfordshire County Council
£38220 - £40777
Help us deliver our vision for adult social care in Oxfordshire About us At Oxfordshire County Council, you do not just work for us… you learn, grow, and thrive with us. Whatever your career aspirations are in adult social care, we are here to supp Banbury
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Community Support Worker - South Essex

Essex County Council
£25395.00 - £32131.00 per annum
Community Support Worker - South EssexPermanent, Full Time£25,395 to £32,131 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Programme Engagement Officer (Thurrock)

Essex County Council
£26485.00 - £31158.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Programme Engagement Officer (Thurrock)Permanent, Full Time£26,485 to £31,158 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Chief Finance Officer (Section 151 Officer)

Somerset Council
Competitive, with a package commensurate with experience
A career-defining leadership role in one of England’s most important new unitary authorities Somerset / Hybrid (2–3 days per week on site on average)
Recuriter: Somerset Council
Linkedin Banner