27 February 2007

Bureaucracy is 'stifling' transport improvements

Britain’s transport problems will not improve unless the Government loosens its grip on the finances available to cities and towns, an all-party group of MPs claims.
Redevelopment schemes, like the proposed Birmingham Gateway, are being put on hold because city councils are denied the ability to raise the funding for essential transport infrastructure.
The All Party Urban Development Group’s (APUDG) inquiry into infrastructure provision in the UK concludes that an excessively centralised system of finance is stifling new investment in Britain’s transport infrastructure.
The report, Loosening the Leash, says that Britain’s infrastructure crisis is partly due to Whitehall micro-management, excessive bureaucracy, too many funding streams, and financial rules that constrain local government’s ability to help fund their own infrastructure.
The group calls on the forthcoming Lyons Inquiry and Comprehensive Spending Review to devolve funding and financial powers to Britain’s cities and towns – which need financial freedom from Whitehall to deliver better transport.
The report recommends two new local financial powers that would increase local investment in vital infrastructure:
 
• Tax Increment Financing – already used in the United States and Australia – would allow local authorities to build infrastructure ahead of new development.
 
• Supplementary Business Rates, with business support, could be used to ring-fence money for transport improvements.
 
The report also warns that the proposed Planning Gain Supplement (PGS), due to be introduced in 2009, could result in further centralisation, bureaucracy, and infrastructure delay. The Government has promoted PGS – a tax levied on the increase in land values that arise when land is granted planning permission – as a solution to infrastructure funding needs. But the APUDG is concerned that some of the proposed tax will be taken and redistributed by the Treasury – and that it will not provide the up-front infrastructure funding that our cities and towns need. Government must urgently clarify PGS, before rushing into implementation.  
“Britain’s cities are being held back by our centralised funding system, said group chair Clive Betts. “Government needs to empower city leaders to take more of their own decisions. Today’s report recommends some new local financial powers, for cities to fund more of their own transport systems. Our message is clear: greater devolution is essential for the future success of our cities.”
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior/Principal Regeneration Officer

Fareham Borough Council
£45,465 - £55,379
Our town centre regeneration is moving from planning to delivery, and we're looking for someone who wants to help make regeneration happen. Fareham, Hampshire
Recuriter: Fareham Borough Council

Social Worker

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£40,260 - £54,507
Social Worker£... London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

S106 and Monitoring Officer

Essex County Council
£49435.1400 - £54930.6000 per annum
Maldon District Council is working in partnership with Essex Shared Services to support the recruitment of the role of a S106 and Monitoring Officer, England, Essex, Maldon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officer (Part Time)

Isle of Wight Council
Career Grade 3-6, £26,017 to £29,071 per annum pro-rata (actual salary £17,227.47 to £19,249.72)
The Benefits team is currently seeking a part-time Trainee Revenues and Benefits Officers Ryde, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council

Legal Officer

Isle of Wight Council
Grade 9, £35,572 to £38,726 per annum
Ideally you will be a qualified paralegal or will offer an equivalent qualification or experience. Newport, Isle of Wight
Recuriter: Isle of Wight Council
Linkedin Banner