04 December 2013

The consequences of ECO cuts

Earlier this week the Government ended months of speculation by announcing reforms to the Energy Company Obligation (ECO).

Energy and climate change secretary Ed Davey revealed ministers’ intention to reduce financial support for some energy efficiency improvements across the country. It also emerged that the time frame in which energy companies need to make these improvements to people’s homes had been extended.

This decision effectively halves the amount of support given to some householders, including those most vulnerable and living in fuel poverty, while potentially delaying the action which will help bring down the cost of energy bills.

Prior to this decision, last week, I wrote to the Prime Minister’s energy advisor, Tara Singh outlining my concerns. Officials from the Cabinet Office and Department of Energy and Climate Change were copied in also. This action was supported by colleagues across the industry.

Solid Wall Insulation has a key and fundamental role to play in reducing energy bills, in some cases by up to 50%, and tackling fuel poverty. In our experience the majority of on-going ECO carbon emission reduction obligationprojects, are being delivered to low income, fuel poor households, in partnership with local authorities and social housing providers.

There is also significant evidence within the industry of a shift in the 'able to pay' market, where homeowners are starting to appreciate the benefits of solid wall insulation and are more willing to make personal investments in their property.

Only last month, the Local Government Association (LGA) warned that energy companies were sitting on more than £1bn which was intended for ECO scheme improvements. It is no secret that energy providers do not like this scheme. The LGA called on government to step up the pace of installations stating the obligation energy firms have to invest in these projects “swiftly and effectively” in order to deliver upgrades to keep the vulnerable warm and healthy this winter.

Unfortunately this advice was not heeded. And the result will be dire for the industry which was working with local government in order to deliver these improvements for residents in communities across the country.

Tim Deathridge, managing director of leading external insulation manufacturer, Sto

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Worker (Link Role) - 12 month Fixed Term Contract

Essex County Council
£33049.00 - £37698.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Family Worker (Link Role)Fixed Term, Full Time£33,049 to £37,698 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Head of Finance - Children & Young People’s Service

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£75,585 - £80,726 (pay award pending)
This is a great place to work for people who want to make a real difference. Riverside House, Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Sessional Learning Delivery Assistant

Durham County Council
Grade 7
Durham County Council
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Business Support Assistant

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.00 per annum
Business Support AssistantFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Digital Development Manager

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£51,540 - £62,451 per annum
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner