04 December 2013

The consequences of ECO cuts

Earlier this week the Government ended months of speculation by announcing reforms to the Energy Company Obligation (ECO).

Energy and climate change secretary Ed Davey revealed ministers’ intention to reduce financial support for some energy efficiency improvements across the country. It also emerged that the time frame in which energy companies need to make these improvements to people’s homes had been extended.

This decision effectively halves the amount of support given to some householders, including those most vulnerable and living in fuel poverty, while potentially delaying the action which will help bring down the cost of energy bills.

Prior to this decision, last week, I wrote to the Prime Minister’s energy advisor, Tara Singh outlining my concerns. Officials from the Cabinet Office and Department of Energy and Climate Change were copied in also. This action was supported by colleagues across the industry.

Solid Wall Insulation has a key and fundamental role to play in reducing energy bills, in some cases by up to 50%, and tackling fuel poverty. In our experience the majority of on-going ECO carbon emission reduction obligationprojects, are being delivered to low income, fuel poor households, in partnership with local authorities and social housing providers.

There is also significant evidence within the industry of a shift in the 'able to pay' market, where homeowners are starting to appreciate the benefits of solid wall insulation and are more willing to make personal investments in their property.

Only last month, the Local Government Association (LGA) warned that energy companies were sitting on more than £1bn which was intended for ECO scheme improvements. It is no secret that energy providers do not like this scheme. The LGA called on government to step up the pace of installations stating the obligation energy firms have to invest in these projects “swiftly and effectively” in order to deliver upgrades to keep the vulnerable warm and healthy this winter.

Unfortunately this advice was not heeded. And the result will be dire for the industry which was working with local government in order to deliver these improvements for residents in communities across the country.

Tim Deathridge, managing director of leading external insulation manufacturer, Sto

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner