Thomas Bridge 12 June 2015

Housing chief blasts Right to Buy expansion as ‘dangerously bad’

The chief of UK housing associations has warned Right to Buy expansion is a ‘dangerously bad’ policy that would hamper national ambition.

David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, has said Government plans to extend discounts on buying a home to 1.3m tenants in housing association properties would ‘deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support’.

Councils would be forced to sell off thousands of their most valuable social residences to fund the policy, with three London boroughs recently claiming they would face losing 3,500 council homes in five years under the proposals. Orr has now said this approach could hamper long term house building, failing to leave enough money for future construction.

Communities secretary Greg Clark has maintained the policy would ‘add to housing stock’, with every housing association property sold being ‘replaced one-for-one with a new property’.

Prime minister David Cameron has also backed the plans, claiming it will see ‘a new generation given the security of a home of their own’.

However Orr has said the measure ‘completely fails to make the most efficient possible use of public investment’, which isn’t ‘workable or coherent’.

‘At its heart, imposing the Right to Buy on housing associations is a policy that will deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support,’ he said.

‘If the Government can force councils to sell their high value stock and from the proceeds give £100,000 or more to one household to support that household's aspiration to own, it denies the chance to use that £100,000 to build new homes. That money, with the additional private borrowing that housing associations generate, could deliver four brand new homes for shared ownership with all of the associated economic benefits that come from building new homes.

‘To meet the aspiration of one already well housed family denies the aspirations of four others. There are many other measures we could develop with government that support ownership aspirations and the aspirations of those who need a good, secure affordable home in a much more cost effective way.’

‘If ever there was a time for Parliament to intervene and stop dangerously bad legislation it is now,’ Orr added.

Photo: Tom Gowanlock/Shutterstock.com

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Pause Practice Lead

Oxfordshire County Council
£54495 - £57864
Are you an ambitious, creative and influential leader who is passionate about reducing the number of children being removed into care by supporting women to bring about change in their lives? About Pause Pause works with women who have experienced re Oxford
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Multi Schools Council Quadrant Facilitator

Essex County Council
£29121.00 - £34259.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Multi Schools Council Quadrant FacilitatorPermanent, Full Time£29,121 to £34,259 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Early Help Navigators (MASH Service)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£40,737 - £49,365 per annum
Early Help Navigators (MASH Service)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Residential Worker

Durham County Council
£30,024 - £33,699 plus allowances
WHAT WE DO MATTERS The team at Aycliffe Secure Centre provide a caring, trauma informed and aspirational environment for young people aged between 10 Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Occupational Therapist

Oxfordshire County Council
£38220 - £40777
Help us deliver our vision for adult social care in Oxfordshire About us At Oxfordshire County Council, you do not just work for us… you learn, grow, and thrive with us. Whatever your career aspirations are in adult social care, we are here to supp Banbury
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council
Linkedin Banner