Thomas Bridge 12 June 2015

Housing chief blasts Right to Buy expansion as ‘dangerously bad’

The chief of UK housing associations has warned Right to Buy expansion is a ‘dangerously bad’ policy that would hamper national ambition.

David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, has said Government plans to extend discounts on buying a home to 1.3m tenants in housing association properties would ‘deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support’.

Councils would be forced to sell off thousands of their most valuable social residences to fund the policy, with three London boroughs recently claiming they would face losing 3,500 council homes in five years under the proposals. Orr has now said this approach could hamper long term house building, failing to leave enough money for future construction.

Communities secretary Greg Clark has maintained the policy would ‘add to housing stock’, with every housing association property sold being ‘replaced one-for-one with a new property’.

Prime minister David Cameron has also backed the plans, claiming it will see ‘a new generation given the security of a home of their own’.

However Orr has said the measure ‘completely fails to make the most efficient possible use of public investment’, which isn’t ‘workable or coherent’.

‘At its heart, imposing the Right to Buy on housing associations is a policy that will deny the aspirations of many, many more people than it will support,’ he said.

‘If the Government can force councils to sell their high value stock and from the proceeds give £100,000 or more to one household to support that household's aspiration to own, it denies the chance to use that £100,000 to build new homes. That money, with the additional private borrowing that housing associations generate, could deliver four brand new homes for shared ownership with all of the associated economic benefits that come from building new homes.

‘To meet the aspiration of one already well housed family denies the aspirations of four others. There are many other measures we could develop with government that support ownership aspirations and the aspirations of those who need a good, secure affordable home in a much more cost effective way.’

‘If ever there was a time for Parliament to intervene and stop dangerously bad legislation it is now,’ Orr added.

Photo: Tom Gowanlock/Shutterstock.com

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Worker - Family Support & Protection, Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£36124.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker in the Family Support & Protection team based in Mid Essex. England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Lead Child Protection Practitioner

Cheshire East Council
£48,072 - £54,994 per annum
Help shape the future of child protection in Cheshire East. Crewe, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

Service Manager - Multi Agency Child Protection Team

Cheshire East Council
£54,994 - £62,777 per annum
Lead the future of multi-agency child protection in Cheshire East. Crewe, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

SEND Locality Manager

Cheshire East Council
£54,994 - £62,777 per annum
Ready to lead and shape the future of SEND services? Macclesfield, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

Senior Social Worker - Countywide Enhanced Support Inreach

Essex County Council
£48205 - £57988 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
Please note that visa sponsorship is not available for this role. Applicants must have a current, unrestricted right to work in the UK.This is a part England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner