Mark Whitehead 17 September 2015

£86,000 for a new image: money well spent?

We live in image-conscious times. But we also live in cost-conscious times: this is the rub with a plan by a north London council to spend almost £86,000 on a rebranding exercise.

Many will sympathise with Haringey’s leaders wanting to give its logo, signage and general appearance a once-over.

Especially as the borough is full of media types who might regard the price tag as pretty reasonable compared with what a commercial company might spend on a new image.

But Haringay, like other councils up and down the land, has had its budgets slashed and been forced to make big cuts including in its social services.

So it’s not surprising opposition leaders should describe the whole thing as ‘outrageous’.

The council’s case for a new look hasn’t been helped by the apparently secretive approach local critics accuse it of adopting.

There is a report outlining the project explains the rationale behind it, the costs and how the agency was selected. It’s all perfectly above board and makes a clear case for spending the money.

There have evidently been focus groups asking what people feel about the place where they live which has apparently fed into the new designs.

The problem is, the general population in the streets of Haringey knew nothing about any of it.

One local activist went to the trouble of submitting a Freedom of Information request to find out what rumours of a new logo, street signs and stationery were all about.

That was on 25 June. A reply finally on 6 August arrived saying £40,000 had been allocated to explore a change of identity but ‘no decision has been taken.’

Full information on the project could not be given, it explained, because under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act its release would be likely to inhibit ’free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation.’

So Haringey will shortly have a new logo, its staff will sport shiny pin badges and the refuse trucks will display rebranded signs.

Whether or not the money has been well spent is up for public discussion - which will no doubt commence now that people know what was decided, how much of their council tax went on it and what the new image will look like.

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Head of Head of Rent Service

Redbridge London Borough Council
£79,119 - £82,368
This leadership role in the Council, with responsibility for the effective and efficient collection of rent across the Housing Revenue Account Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Solutions Architect

Essex County Council
£51563.0000 - £60662.0000 per annum
Solutions ArchitectPermanent, Full Time£51,563 to £60,662 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Specialist Senior Educational Psychologist

Essex County Council
£59809.00 - £63638.00 per annum
Specialist Senior Educational PsychologistPermanent, Full TimeSoulbury Scale B from 3 to 5 plus SPA Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Family Worker (Link Role) - 12 month FTC

Essex County Council
£33049.00 - £37698.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Family Worker (Link Role)Fixed Term, Full Time£33,049 to £37,698 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Cleaner

North Yorkshire Council
£13.28 per hour
You will be responsible for the cleaning duties on site including dusting, vacuuming and the cleaning of sanitary fittings. Whitby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner