William Eichler 03 May 2022

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote image
Image: Sangiao Photography / Shutterstock.com.

The progressive vote will be systematically ‘split’ in next week’s council elections because of the winner-takes-all electoral system, campaigners say.

The Politics for the Many campaign has warned that the First Past the Post system gives the right an advantage in local elections and forces people on the left to vote tactically.

Using data collated by Democracy Club, Politics for the Many found that in 43.8% of wards, there is one unified 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against all three of the progressive 'left' parties (Lab/Lib Dem/Green).

There are a further 35.5% of wards where there is one 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against two of the largest 'left' parties (either Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens).

In 81.7% of wards, there are more 'left' parties standing candidates than 'right' parties. There are only 15 wards in the whole of England (0.5% of wards) where there are more right parties standing than left parties.

Nancy Platts, coordinator of the Politics for the Many campaign, said: ‘We’ve seen all too many times how our voting system serves as a barrier to progressive change, amplifying the votes of some while casting others on the scrap heap. The result – a winner-takes-all system that gifts unearned majorities to the government of the day. Governments that are all too often conservative.

‘It’s a system that forces voters to vote tactically, often supporting the ‘least worst’ candidate in order to try and game the broken system. In these local elections the odds are once again stacked against progressives and the results will likely reflect that in seats up and down the country.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Director of Place Based Growth

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£Competitive
Driving development, inward investment and economic growth. Richmond upon Thames, London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Director of Place Planning

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£Competitive
Leading place making policies and development management. Richmond upon Thames, London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Executive Director, Place and Customer

Essex County Council
up to £179,404 per annum
Shape the Future of Essex. Drive climate action. Deliver for our communities.Essex is on the government's Priority Programme for Local Government Ref England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Waste Services Operative

Hyndburn Borough Council
£26,403 to £28,142 per annum
The successful candidate will be joining the Council’s extremely successful Waste Services team Accrington, Lancashire
Recuriter: Hyndburn Borough Council

Waste Service Team Leader/Driver Cat C

Hyndburn Borough Council
£31,537 - £33,699 per annum
Above all, you must take pride in your work and be willing to make a difference to the overall cleanliness of the Borough. North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: Hyndburn Borough Council
Linkedin Banner