William Eichler 03 May 2022

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote

Winner-takes-all system ‘splits’ progressive vote image
Image: Sangiao Photography / Shutterstock.com.

The progressive vote will be systematically ‘split’ in next week’s council elections because of the winner-takes-all electoral system, campaigners say.

The Politics for the Many campaign has warned that the First Past the Post system gives the right an advantage in local elections and forces people on the left to vote tactically.

Using data collated by Democracy Club, Politics for the Many found that in 43.8% of wards, there is one unified 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against all three of the progressive 'left' parties (Lab/Lib Dem/Green).

There are a further 35.5% of wards where there is one 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against two of the largest 'left' parties (either Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens).

In 81.7% of wards, there are more 'left' parties standing candidates than 'right' parties. There are only 15 wards in the whole of England (0.5% of wards) where there are more right parties standing than left parties.

Nancy Platts, coordinator of the Politics for the Many campaign, said: ‘We’ve seen all too many times how our voting system serves as a barrier to progressive change, amplifying the votes of some while casting others on the scrap heap. The result – a winner-takes-all system that gifts unearned majorities to the government of the day. Governments that are all too often conservative.

‘It’s a system that forces voters to vote tactically, often supporting the ‘least worst’ candidate in order to try and game the broken system. In these local elections the odds are once again stacked against progressives and the results will likely reflect that in seats up and down the country.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Transport and Major Work Manager

Slough Borough Council
£54,556 to £60,085 per year Inclusive of Local Weighting Allowance of £1096
Drive the future of transport and infrastructure in Slough Slough, Berkshire
Recuriter: Slough Borough Council

Residential Worker

Essex County Council
£27935.00 - £35344.00 per annum + includes allowance
Residential WorkerPermanent, Full Time£27,935 - £35,344 per annum (including allowance)Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Programme Manager

Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
£64,582-£70,591 (Coventry & York), £69,204-£75,222 (London)
Every year, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman helps thousands of people who have been let down by public services Hybrid working – allocated to offices in Coventry, York or London
Recuriter: Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman

Streetwork Inspector

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£41,113 to £43,680 including London Weighting
Communities, Environment, and Central have a vacancy in its Network Management Division Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Product Manager

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO5 - £52,194 to £55,323.
Royal Greenwich is a vibrant borough, with a rich history and diverse community. Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Linkedin Banner