Plotting the next steps for Total Place
Michael Burton
The day after last week’s Budget, the Treasury and CLG published their joint report into the 13 Total Place pilot findings, with recommendations about how to take the programme forward. Michael Burton reports
There are many sceptics for whom Total Place was destined to be just another government initiative which would wither on the vine.
Last week’s post-Budget report from the CLG and the Treasury – Total Place: A whole area approach to public services – shows this is anything but the case.
Ministers and Whitehall mandarins, drawing on the lessons of the 13 local government pilots and others, which delivered their findings in February, recognise that the concept of cross-sector delivery is, in theory the future model for public services.
The report accepts that places will be ‘led by local authorities, with their unique local democratic mandate, but requiring the active engagement of the Government and all local service delivery bodies.’
The report, at almost 100 pages, says the Total Place ‘approach’ in England has, so far, involved 63 councils, 34 PCTs. 12 fire authorities, 13 police authorities and the third sector, as well as 70 other areas conducting similar work. They all found that efficiencies and service improvement could be achieved, if there was less duplication.
The 13 local authority pilots mapped £82bn of public spending within their areas, varying from £6,000 per head in Coventry and Solihull, to £8,800 in Bradford and Lewisham. On average, social security, education and health together make up more than 70% of total spend in each area.
In brief, the pilots showed:
- budget constraints are putting the focus on ‘more for less'
- resource mapping has shown the complexity of funding streams
- the public finds services impersonal, fragmented and complex
- the system itself is complex
- a minority of families are responsible for huge costs, but they are dealt with ineffectively and inefficiently through too many agencies
It adds that the ‘new ways of working’ identified by the pilots and other areas ‘can be replicated everywhere’, and will involve breaking down ‘the organisational and service silos which cause confusion to citizens, create wasteful burdens of data collection and management on the frontline, and which contribute to the poor alignment of services.’ What's proposed
Some of the pilots and non-pilot ‘parallel places’ are already redesigning their services, such as with the Kent Gateway, benefits in Central Bedfordshire and Luton, a single customer strategy across Leicester and Leicestershire moving from 65 to 25 call centres, and Westminster’s family recovery programme.
*a ‘single offer’ for councils with new freedoms
*total capital and asset pathfinders’ in 11 areas
*five ‘invest to save’ pathfinders
*extended field trials for pilots
*‘social impact bonds’ trials
*new children and young people’s grant
*streamlined improvement bodies
*single gateways for data reporting
*Accelerated Development Zones for
infrastructure investment
*de-ring-fencing of £1.3bn of grants from 2011/12
*removal of 18 indicators from the National
Indicator set from 2010 (10%)
Others have proposed a single, area-based budget for all local public services. The Coventry/Solihull/Warwickshire pilot proposed a concordat between central and local government based on an agreed level of savings in exchange for greater local flexibility and an end to ring-fencing.
Worcestershire suggested councils should be the main bodies for greater levels of devolved funding.
So, what next for Total Place? The CLG and Treasury now propose a ‘single offer’ for high-performing places, those councils with ‘a strong track record’ which can ‘negotiate’ with Whitehall for more freedoms. In return for working with Whitehall departments ‘to co-design services’, there will be freedoms from performance and financial controls with less ring-fencing and reduced targets.
The first ‘single offer’ will be implemented from April 2011. It will entail councils and their partners identifying annual savings over and above the already-declared efficiencies, although these new savings can be retained and reinvested.
The promises have a ring of the freedom and flexibilities pledged for ‘excellent’-graded CPA councils, and a whiff of the traditional Whitehall patronising tone of offering sweeteners for good behaviour.
Recognising that many councils have strengths in particular policy areas, the report therefore also proposes an ‘innovative policy offer’ to devolve responsibility to places within an agreed delivery theme. It will be similar to the ‘single offer’, but involve only an agreed policy area, and cover a three-year period with an interim report in the 2012 Budget. In addition, a new, multi-agency ‘children and young people’s grant’ will be trialled for the ‘single offer’ and ‘innovative policy’ councils and others from April 2011, using money for families, youth activities and Sure Start, and drawing from the previous area-based ring-fenced grant.
Some of the pilots’ work in areas such as alcohol, drug misuse and tackling worklessness will also continue as ‘extended field trials’, working with Whitehall champions.
The Leicester City/Leicestershire, Luton/Central Bedfordshire and Kent pilots will carry on looking at co-locating job centres and council services; Kent and Worcestershire CC will work with Whitehall on public property efficiencies; Durham, Kent and Worcestershire will look at aligning housing and regeneration streams; and so on.
There will be 11 new ‘total capital and asset pathfinders’ in each region to look at better aligning investment and asset management in a place. They are Cambridgeshire, Durham, Hackney, Hampshire, Hull, Leicester/Leicestershire, Leeds city-region, Solihull, Swindon, Wigan and Worcestershire.
The pathfinders will complement the regional property strategies for Whitehall relocation. The report says it is keen to involve other places.
The report also promises to trial ‘social impact bonds’ to help areas invest in long-term initiatives, especially where one organisation invests, yet another benefits, a consistent obstacle to pooling of budgets.
Pilot areas will be Peterborough and the Ministry of Justice, the CLG and Leeds on adaptations to housing for independent living, and further work in original Total Place pilot Bradford.
Data reporting requirements are to be reduced, with single gateways for each frontline public service sector, reviewing the rules on sharing personal data with a report in December 2010.
The Government is also to review and then streamline the myriad number of improvement bodies across the whole public sector, with the aim of reducing their costs by 30% from 2011.
In addition, ‘accelerated development zones’ will be created for cities and ‘growth hubs’ to support infrastructure investment, with capital grant funding up to £120m in 2011/12 for ‘selected local authorities’. The grant will come from ‘reprioritisation of RDA funding and paid out to the winning cities/growth hubs’ as a grant from the RDAs.
The RDAs, HCA and government offices will also be co-located.
Your comments
There are currently no comments, be the first!
Back |
Top of page |





Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon


digg
