Council freezes Twitter account after insult gaffe
Arun Marsh
A local newspaper has reported that a member of the council's staff used the account to criticise the reporter, claiming 'a squirrel could have run rings' around her after she had interviewed TV personality Esther Rantzen.
The council claim that the post was supposed to be a private message, but was instead published for all to see.
It was then forced to post a further message which said: 'A few have picked up on a tweet about Esther R interview that was meant to be a PM (private message). No offence intended to ES (Evening Standard) lady! Still learning here!'
The council has since decided to freeze the Your Croydon account admitting it had no rules about using social networking sites under official publications, and that the name Your Croydon was used without 'authority or managerial knowledge'.
A spokesman said: 'We need someone to find out how Twitter works, review its potential and then enlighten others as to how best it may be used for legitimate, professional purposes.
'As yet there are no rules about using this kind of channel.
'As with email and the internet a few years back, guidelines will be developed if the media enters common usage.
'Exploring how it might be used is a precursor to this.
'For now we consider it frozen.
'It’s the firm belief that the Your Croydon publication needs to concentrate on developing its identity in print, not cyberspace.'
Croydon's Labour opposition leader, has attacked the council over the gaffe.
Councillor Tony Newman said: 'It is completely wrong and disgraceful. It is an abuse of taxpayers’ money.
'How anyone could ever suggest that a public body could control a Twitter account is beyond me.'
Coun Newman said the council had known about the Twitter account, having been the subject of talks in the town hall, and it had launched Your Croydon to 'undermine and attack local media'.
For more information on what Twitter is, see our Twitter feature. Also dont forget to follow @localgoveditors.
Your comments
Political point-scoring as captured here is what makes me doubt the government's commitment to a more open and transparent way of operating. Twitter's a fairly new means of communicating there are bound to be mistakes. Cheap shots for political gain only encourage the kind of risk-averse behaviour that's routinely decried for stifling innovation in government. As for hysterical, ill-thought out comments suggesting a Twitter account as a way to "undermine" & "attack"local media. Where to start?
Ade Adewunmi, Added: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 01:28 PM
Their profile even has a disclaimer: 'opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Croydon Council'. Coun Newman needs to wake up and realise that things are changing: people are using new platforms to engage in real time with civic society, no longer content just to read about it. And come on: "concentrate on developing its identity in print, not cyberspace ... It is an abuse of taxpayers? money"? Tell me, is print really more cost effective than Twitter?
Michael,Blogger,citizensheep.com, Added: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 01:01 PM
Can anyone truly control an socnet account? should they even try?
anon, Added: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 12:23 PM
Back |
Top of page |




Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon


digg
