Full list of the LGA's banned words
Actioned – do
Your comments
I cannot believe my eyes. Jargon can be counterproductive, but many of these words and terms are functional and frankly they are terms that once picks up throughout their education and career, much like one picks up a new job. Of course we should take care to use them properly. I think this will lead to further dumbing down, and frankly, I'm finding this extremely hard to comprehend!
Joana Abreu Jackson, Intern, South West UK Brussels Office, Added: Friday, 10 April 2009 09:54 AM
Shouldn't the list include "Stressed out" instead of "busy"
Barry Brown, Policy , Added: Thursday, 26 March 2009 05:04 PM
I agree that jargon should be avoided, however the use of the correct word in the correct context is completely acceptable and if someone does not understand the meaning of that word, then they should look it up in a dictionary. I object to the dumbing down of the english language and feel that we should be striving to raise our standards, not lowering them.
Ann Banks, Building Control Technician, Stratford-upon-Avon District Council, Added: Thursday, 26 March 2009 11:29 AM
I agree that jargon should be avoided, but some of the proposed alternatives are less clear or simply wrong. Does an upward trend in crime statistics really mean that things are getting better?
Eamonn Collins, Thames-Gateway.tv, Added: Friday, 20 March 2009 11:47 AM
I don't want to be picky, but "well-being" is a noun, "healthy" is an adjective. And "upward trend" means "getting better"? That's interesting in relation to crime figures! "Theme" is a noun, "thematic" is an adjective etc. Do they really want is talking about 'singing from the same hymnsheet" (and might that not offend athiests anyway?) Please promote plain English, but not in such a sloppy, headline-grabbing way. It does more harm than good.
Bren McGowan,,, Added: Thursday, 19 March 2009 10:30 PM
All words have a use in the right context. Banning those that are used in the wrong context is correct (good english in fact) but banning the use of selected words in every context is just as wrong. The problem is not the words but people who don't understand meaning and context. I guess that those who endlessly used these words when they came into fashion will be no wiser when they drop out and as a result the new 'acceptable' words will become just as meaningless.
Ian Jenkinson, Editor, Municipal Engineer, Added: Thursday, 19 March 2009 08:47 PM
My greatest regret is that EFFICIENCY REVIEW is not included in this list! Why should we pretend that making people redundant and cutting services just to meet blanket spending cuts set by central government is in any way more efficient?
Cllr Alex Perkins Canterbury City Council, Added: Thursday, 19 March 2009 01:50 PM
This is the sort of list that should only be published on 1st April!
Nicola Hill, HR Manager, , Added: Thursday, 19 March 2009 11:19 AM
As a public sector plain English trainer, I couldn't agree more and add avoiding tautology as well as unexplained acronyms for clearer communication. Get a free copy of my local government Plain English guide and dictionary, with four pages of public sector acronyms explained,and ten pages of 'posh' words made plainer by e-mailing julia.buckland@btinternet.com or call 01332 370144.
Julia Buckland Plain English Doctor Service, Derby, Added: Thursday, 19 March 2009 10:51 AM
Social exclusion is about far more than poverty - it encompasses all areas and all six strands of equality and diversity - if you are unable to use English as a first language you are socially excluded but not necessarily poor!
Ann Catchpole, Policy Officer, Stratford-on-Avon DC, Added: Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:40 PM
A worthy cause but some of the suggested "improvements" are less clear than the originals - for instance we all know what is meant by transparency in government and clear will not do as a substitute.
Mark Forester, consultant. Powys, Added: Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:13 PM
Whoever compiled this list has a limited vocabulary of the English language. Many of the words have different meanings depending upon the context (whoops! almost used one then!)in which they are used. Also many of the plain language alternatives are not appropriate e.g. Advocate might also mean propose rather than support, although in this instance I agree that the relevant plain language alternative should be used. Another example is Stakeholder where Participator or Contributor is better
Alan Arnold, Director and Honorary Solicitor to Dorset Chamber of Commerce , Added: Wednesday, 18 March 2009 11:08 AM
I think if you use the word "seedbed" instead of "idea", you should be shot.
L. Richie - Neasden Conkers Association, Added: Wednesday, 18 March 2009 10:48 AM
Back |
Top of page |




Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon


digg
